H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ann Kiyomura Hayashi vs Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel H2H: 1-1
Ann Kiyomura Hayashi and Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel leads 1–0 on carpet, while Ann Kiyomura Hayashi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel won the 1982 Washington third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 70
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Age 59
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 1982 | Washington | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 6-4 6-1 | Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | Match data |
| Aug 17, 1981 | Toronto | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | 6-3 6-4 | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | — | — | — | 1,924 | 182 | 200 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | — | — | — | 2,082 | 277 | 213 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 12 | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 13 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 2 |
| 15 | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 30–19 | 61.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | 1972 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1973 | 28–30 | 48.3% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1974 | 24–13 | 64.9% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 41–16 | 71.9% | — | 1,975 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1975 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 34–16 | 68.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1976 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1977 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,812 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1978 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,803 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1979 | 26–22 | 54.2% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,698 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1980 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1981 | 23–19 | 54.8% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1982 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1983 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1984 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 4 |