H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ann Kiyomura Hayashi vs Marcie Louie H2H: 0-1
Marcie Louie holds a 1–0 lead over Ann Kiyomura Hayashi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marcie Louie leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marcie Louie won the 1974 Dallas third round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 1974* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Marcie Louie | 6-2 6-0 | Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | — | — | — | 1,924 | 182 | 200 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Marcie Louie | — | — | — | 1,867 | 103 | 141 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | Marcie Louie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 12 | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 13 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 4–1 | 80.0% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1972 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1973 | 28–30 | 48.3% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 1974 | 24–13 | 64.9% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 19–20 | 48.7% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1975 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 7–20 | 25.9% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1976 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 11–17 | 39.3% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1977 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1978 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,803 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1979 | 26–22 | 54.2% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,646 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1980 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1981 | 23–19 | 54.8% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1982 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1983 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1984 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |