H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Ann Kiyomura Hayashi vs Mima Jausovec H2H: 2-0

Ann Kiyomura Hayashi holds a 2–0 lead over Mima Jausovec in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ann Kiyomura Hayashi leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Ann Kiyomura Hayashi won the 1979 Oakland quarterfinal 6-3 2-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ann Kiyomura Hayashi
USA
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Mima Jausovec
SLO Age 70 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ann Kiyomura Hayashi 6-3 2-6 7-5 Mima Jausovec Match data Jan 13, 1979* QF Oakland WTA 250 Carpet
Ann Kiyomura Hayashi 4-6 6-4 6-3 Mima Jausovec Match data Jan 1, 1979 R16 Washington Open WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ann Kiyomura Hayashi — — — 1,925 182 200 47.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Mima Jausovec #400 #23 2 2,090 339 246 57.9% 1 0 0 1 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Ann Kiyomura Hayashi Mima Jausovec
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1968 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0 1972 2–0 100.0% — 1,533 0 1
1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,473 0 0 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,560 0 1
1970 0–1 0.0% — 1,459 0 0 1974 18–13 58.1% — 1,793 0 1
1971 0–1 0.0% — 1,457 0 0 1975 16–19 45.7% — 1,833 0 1
1972 5–4 55.6% — 1,516 0 0 1976 33–16 67.3% — 2,004 0 4
1973 28–30 48.3% — 1,648 0 0 1977 32–21 60.4% — 2,010 1 5
1974 24–13 64.9% — 1,789 0 0 1978 29–19 60.4% — 1,947 1 6
1975 7–12 36.8% — 1,749 0 0 1979 32–28 53.3% — 1,870 1 6
1976 9–16 36.0% — 1,724 0 0 1980 34–22 60.7% — 1,945 1 6
1977 4–8 33.3% — 1,740 0 0 1981 57–28 67.1% — 2,013 1 6
1978 10–7 58.8% — 1,809 0 1 1982 36–24 60.0% — 1,857 1 7
1979 26–22 54.2% — 1,874 0 1 1983 23–16 59.0% — 1,873 1 7
1980 13–20 39.4% — 1,718 0 1 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,747 1 7
1981 23–19 54.8% — 1,852 0 2 1985 9–12 42.9% #82 1,695 1 7
1982 18–20 47.4% — 1,828 0 2 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7
1983 13–20 39.4% — 1,716 0 2 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7
1984 2–5 28.6% — 1,686 0 2 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Ann Kiyomura Hayashi Mima Jausovec
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1968 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 — — — — 2 0 2 100.0% — — — — — — — —
1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
1970 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
1971 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 9 11 18.2%
1972 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 21 3 24 87.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 9 18 50.0%
1973 4 5 9 44.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 20 6 26 76.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6%
1974 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 14 7 21 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 9 16 43.8%
1975 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1979 6 7 13 46.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 16 13 29 55.2%
1976 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 9 14 35.7% 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 16 13 29 55.2%
1977 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 28 14 42 66.7%
1978 4 2 6 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 23 10 33 69.7%
1979 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 15 13 28 53.6% 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
1980 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 3 8 11 27.3% 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
1981 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1982 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 5 8 13 38.5% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
1983 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 4 6 10 40.0% 4 9 13 30.8% 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
1984 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
Career 47 48 95 49.5% 17 17 34 50.0% 62 57 119 52.1% 55 77 132 41.7% Career 35 43 78 44.9% 145 67 212 68.4% 42 33 75 56.0% 117 103 220 53.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Ann Kiyomura Hayashi Mima Jausovec
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1968 1488 90.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.08 1972 1533 109.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +3.75 — — — +0.55
1969 1473 94.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.08 1973 1561 114.8 — — — — — +38 — 57.1% +1.57 1–0 — — +0.21
1970 1460 98.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.19 1974 1794 144.8 — — — — -138 -70 -107 55.2% +0.37 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.8 -1.90
1971 1457 104.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.19 1975 1833 146.7 — — — — -145 +20 -114 48.1% -0.05 7–6 (54%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -1.97
1972 1516 107.6 — — — — — — +85 47.6% +0.24 3–0 (100%) 0–1 — +1.18 1976 2004 156.6 — — — — -268 +60 -233 61.6% +1.23 11–5 (69%) 4–6 (40%) 104.5 -3.78
1973 1648 127.6 — — — — -75 -23 -24 50.0% -0.14 8–12 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 99.3 +4.25 1977 2011 161.6 — — — — -207 +128 -274 61.5% +0.98 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.6 -5.51
1974 1789 136.8 — — — — -106 -163 +40 59.5% +0.55 8–4 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 107.2 +0.93 1978 1947 147.6 — — — — -137 +161 -129 58.9% +0.51 10–5 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 100.0 -3.80
1975 1750 124.3 — — — — -7 — +32 38.6% -1.16 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) 100.1 -0.93 1979 1871 146.4 — — — — -10 +166 -109 54.4% +0.40 6–10 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 95.8 -0.84
1976 1724 127.9 — — — — -53 -75 +49 41.1% -0.80 3–5 (38%) 1–1 — -0.96 1980 1945 155.9 — — — — +3 +49 -109 58.7% +0.84 6–3 (67%) 3–9 (25%) 100.1 -3.63
1977 1740 135.0 — — — — -68 — +42 37.0% -0.93 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -1.45 1981 2013 157.1 — — — — 0 +4 -103 63.1% +1.07 16–11 (59%) 11–4 (73%) 104.3 -2.76
1978 1810 140.1 — — — — -59 -135 -22 56.8% +0.62 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.7 -0.22 1982 1858 148.5 — — — — +114 +111 -66 59.3% +0.50 9–13 (41%) 9–3 (75%) 95.9 -0.56
1979 1875 150.3 — — — — +16 — -129 53.6% +0.14 12–8 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 104.4 -0.58 1983 1874 143.9 — — — — -17 +151 -63 58.4% +0.64 5–6 (45%) 2–5 (29%) 94.5 -2.67
1980 1719 127.4 — — — — +24 — -38 46.7% -0.05 4–9 (31%) 2–4 (33%) 91.8 -0.63 1984 1748 131.7 — — — — -27 +199 — 46.8% -0.18 1–5 (17%) 2–5 (29%) 88.9 -1.31
1981 1852 135.7 — — — — -26 -139 -64 53.7% +0.03 6–5 (55%) 3–2 (60%) 101.7 -0.47 1985 1695 127.6 — — — — -21 +205 — 45.8% -0.33 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 94.8 -0.67
1982 1828 133.7 — — — — -41 — 0 43.0% -0.73 9–5 (64%) 6–1 (86%) 108.1 -4.10 1986 1673 105.7 — — — — — +197 — 40.0% -1.80 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.18
1983 1717 130.9 — — — — +25 — +29 42.0% -0.68 2–3 (40%) 6–3 (67%) 100.2 -1.71 1987 1656 107.2 — — — — — +179 — 40.0% -1.60 0–2 — — -0.33
1984 1687 109.3 — — — — -20 — +88 26.7% -2.27 1–0 1–0 — -0.36 1988 1641 110.1 — — — — — +162 — 25.0% -2.75 — — — -0.77
Career 1926 140.1 — — — — -21 -76 +3 48.0% -0.26 62–60 (51%) 33–26 (56%) 104.8 -1.34 Career 2091 156.0 — — — — -46 +105 -119 57.2% +0.57 84–85 (50%) 55–55 (50%) 94.6 -5.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.