H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ann Kiyomura Hayashi vs Raffaella Reggi Concato H2H: 0-1
Raffaella Reggi Concato holds a 1–0 lead over Ann Kiyomura Hayashi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Raffaella Reggi Concato leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Raffaella Reggi Concato won the 1984 Mahwah second round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 70
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 60
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 1984* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Raffaella Reggi Concato | 6-2 6-2 | Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | — | — | — | 1,924 | 182 | 200 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | — | — | — | 1,930 | 256 | 176 | 59.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | Raffaella Reggi Concato | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 12 | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 13 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1972 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,424 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1973 | 28–30 | 48.3% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1974 | 24–13 | 64.9% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1975 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1976 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 31–20 | 60.8% | — | 1,896 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1977 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 39–21 | 65.0% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1978 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,803 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1979 | 26–22 | 54.2% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 39–22 | 63.9% | — | 1,863 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1980 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,818 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1981 | 23–19 | 54.8% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1982 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1983 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1984 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |