H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ann Kiyomura Hayashi vs Renata Tomanova H2H: 2-1
Ann Kiyomura Hayashi holds a 2–1 lead over Renata Tomanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ann Kiyomura Hayashi leads 1–0 on carpet, while Renata Tomanova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Renata Tomanova won the 1982 Australian Open second round 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 70
Right-Handed
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
Age 71
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 1982* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Renata Tomanova | 7-6 6-2 | Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | Match data |
| Sep 4, 1978* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | 6-3 2-6 6-3 | Renata Tomanova | Match data |
| Feb 15, 1974* | Providence | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | 4-6 6-2 6-1 | Renata Tomanova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | — | — | — | 1,924 | 182 | 200 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Renata Tomanova | — | — | — | 1,940 | 225 | 214 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | Renata Tomanova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 12 | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 13 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1972 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1973 | 28–30 | 48.3% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1974 | 24–13 | 64.9% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 20–15 | 57.1% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1975 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 21–14 | 60.0% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1976 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 1977 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1978 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,803 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 28–26 | 51.9% | — | 1,854 | 0 | 9 |
| 23 | 1979 | 26–22 | 54.2% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 28–25 | 52.8% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 1980 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 21–26 | 44.7% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1981 | 23–19 | 54.8% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 1982 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 18–16 | 52.9% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1983 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1984 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 9 |