H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Ann Kiyomura Hayashi vs Renata Tomanova H2H: 2-1

Ann Kiyomura Hayashi holds a 2–1 lead over Renata Tomanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ann Kiyomura Hayashi leads 1–0 on carpet, while Renata Tomanova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Renata Tomanova won the 1982 Australian Open round of 64 7-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ann Kiyomura Hayashi
USA
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Renata Tomanova
GER Age 71 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Renata Tomanova 7-6 6-2 Ann Kiyomura Hayashi Match data Dec 3, 1982* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Ann Kiyomura Hayashi 6-3 2-6 6-3 Renata Tomanova Match data Sep 4, 1978* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Ann Kiyomura Hayashi 4-6 6-2 6-1 Renata Tomanova Match data Feb 15, 1974* R16 Providence WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ann Kiyomura Hayashi — — — 1,925 182 200 47.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Renata Tomanova — — — 1,945 223 212 51.3% 0 0 0 0 9 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Ann Kiyomura Hayashi Renata Tomanova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1968 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0 1970 4–4 50.0% — 1,500 0 0
1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,473 0 0 1971 1–1 50.0% — 1,499 0 0
1970 0–1 0.0% — 1,459 0 0 1972 0–2 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
1971 0–1 0.0% — 1,457 0 0 1973 18–14 56.2% — 1,615 0 0
1972 5–4 55.6% — 1,516 0 0 1974 21–13 61.8% — 1,719 0 4
1973 28–30 48.3% — 1,648 0 0 1975 23–16 59.0% — 1,813 0 6
1974 24–13 64.9% — 1,789 0 0 1976 28–22 56.0% — 1,847 0 8
1975 7–12 36.8% — 1,749 0 0 1977 28–26 51.9% — 1,858 0 9
1976 9–16 36.0% — 1,724 0 0 1978 28–25 52.8% — 1,759 0 9
1977 4–8 33.3% — 1,740 0 0 1979 21–26 44.7% — 1,691 0 9
1978 10–7 58.8% — 1,809 0 1 1980 22–22 50.0% — 1,678 0 9
1979 26–22 54.2% — 1,874 0 1 1981 18–16 52.9% — 1,680 0 9
1980 13–20 39.4% — 1,718 0 1 1982 9–12 42.9% — 1,691 0 9
1981 23–19 54.8% — 1,852 0 2 1983 1–8 11.1% — 1,596 0 9
1982 18–20 47.4% — 1,828 0 2 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,580 0 9
1983 13–20 39.4% — 1,716 0 2 1985 1–2 33.3% — 1,569 0 9
1984 2–5 28.6% — 1,686 0 2 1986 0–2 0.0% — 1,532 0 9

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Ann Kiyomura Hayashi Renata Tomanova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1968 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
1970 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1971 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1973 — — — — 17 9 26 65.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
1972 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1974 — — — — 19 8 27 70.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
1973 4 5 9 44.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1975 2 2 4 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
1974 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 14 7 21 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 1976 2 1 3 66.7% 17 7 24 70.8% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 6 6 0.0%
1975 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1977 1 5 6 16.7% 17 7 24 70.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 7 10 17 41.2%
1976 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 9 14 35.7% 1978 4 4 8 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 13 7 20 65.0% 4 8 12 33.3%
1977 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1979 1 7 8 12.5% 9 6 15 60.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 6 9 33.3%
1978 4 2 6 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1980 5 6 11 45.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0%
1979 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 15 13 28 53.6% 1981 5 4 9 55.6% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1980 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 3 8 11 27.3% 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
1981 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1983 0 1 1 0.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
1982 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 5 8 13 38.5% 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1983 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 4 6 10 40.0% 4 9 13 30.8% 1985 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
1984 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career 47 48 95 49.5% 17 17 34 50.0% 62 57 119 52.1% 55 77 132 41.7% Career 21 32 53 39.6% 130 86 216 60.2% 41 43 84 48.8% 20 46 66 30.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Ann Kiyomura Hayashi Renata Tomanova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1968 1488 90.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.08 1970 1500 96.0 — — — — +67 -2 — 40.0% -0.50 4–0 (100%) — — +1.89
1969 1473 94.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.08 1971 1499 98.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.64
1970 1460 98.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.19 1972 1481 96.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — -0.01
1971 1457 104.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.19 1973 1615 134.4 — — — — -83 +113 — 52.1% +0.38 7–2 (78%) 1–2 (33%) 106.4 +2.79
1972 1516 107.6 — — — — — — +85 47.6% +0.24 3–0 (100%) 0–1 — +1.18 1974 1720 129.8 — — — — -209 +100 — 58.7% +0.75 7–2 (78%) 4–2 (67%) 107.8 +2.40
1973 1648 127.6 — — — — -75 -23 -24 50.0% -0.14 8–12 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 99.3 +4.25 1975 1814 140.9 — — — — -168 +118 -259 54.4% +0.01 9–3 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 106.1 -2.52
1974 1789 136.8 — — — — -106 -163 +40 59.5% +0.55 8–4 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 107.2 +0.93 1976 1847 140.8 — — — — -234 +75 -172 54.5% +0.33 6–6 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 98.4 -2.73
1975 1750 124.3 — — — — -7 — +32 38.6% -1.16 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) 100.1 -0.93 1977 1859 152.5 — — — — -167 +104 -182 52.5% +0.14 6–10 (38%) 4–7 (36%) 93.1 -7.11
1976 1724 127.9 — — — — -53 -75 +49 41.1% -0.80 3–5 (38%) 1–1 — -0.96 1978 1759 129.4 — — — — -92 +115 +15 52.9% +0.13 6–9 (40%) 6–4 (60%) 97.2 +1.55
1977 1740 135.0 — — — — -68 — +42 37.0% -0.93 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -1.45 1979 1692 132.3 — — — — -101 +238 +54 45.5% -0.34 10–8 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.6 +2.45
1978 1810 140.1 — — — — -59 -135 -22 56.8% +0.62 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.7 -0.22 1980 1679 128.6 — — — — -147 +207 +30 51.5% +0.20 4–7 (36%) 1–3 (25%) 95.3 -0.95
1979 1875 150.3 — — — — +16 — -129 53.6% +0.14 12–8 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 104.4 -0.58 1981 1680 123.2 — — — — -37 +172 -12 51.2% +0.18 8–6 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +0.40
1980 1719 127.4 — — — — +24 — -38 46.7% -0.05 4–9 (31%) 2–4 (33%) 91.8 -0.63 1982 1692 123.3 — — — — -86 +88 -12 44.2% -0.42 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -1.63
1981 1852 135.7 — — — — -26 -139 -64 53.7% +0.03 6–5 (55%) 3–2 (60%) 101.7 -0.47 1983 1597 97.2 — — — — — +86 — 21.1% -2.40 0–2 1–0 — +0.01
1982 1828 133.7 — — — — -41 — 0 43.0% -0.73 9–5 (64%) 6–1 (86%) 108.1 -4.10 1984 1580 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.09
1983 1717 130.9 — — — — +25 — +29 42.0% -0.68 2–3 (40%) 6–3 (67%) 100.2 -1.71 1985 1569 101.2 — — — — — +46 — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.04
1984 1687 109.3 — — — — -20 — +88 26.7% -2.27 1–0 1–0 — -0.36 1986 1532 90.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.34
Career 1926 140.1 — — — — -21 -76 +3 48.0% -0.26 62–60 (51%) 33–26 (56%) 104.8 -1.34 Career 1946 138.0 — — — — -126 +121 -54 50.6% +0.03 69–57 (55%) 30–33 (48%) 100.5 -0.54

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.