H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Ann Kiyomura Hayashi vs Rosalba Vido H2H: 1-0
Ann Kiyomura Hayashi holds a 1–0 lead over Rosalba Vido in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ann Kiyomura Hayashi leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ann Kiyomura Hayashi won the 1972 Haverford third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 1972* | Haverford | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | 6-2 6-4 | Rosalba Vido | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | — | — | — | 1,924 | 182 | 200 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Rosalba Vido | — | — | — | 1,511 | 10 | 20 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | Rosalba Vido | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 12 | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 13 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1972 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1973 | 28–30 | 48.3% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1974 | 24–13 | 64.9% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1975 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1976 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,464 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1977 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1978 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,803 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1979 | 26–22 | 54.2% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1980 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1981 | 23–19 | 54.8% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1982 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1983 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1984 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |