H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ann Kiyomura Hayashi vs Virginia Ruzici H2H: 1-2
Virginia Ruzici holds a 2–1 lead over Ann Kiyomura Hayashi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Virginia Ruzici leads 1–0 on carpet, while Ann Kiyomura Hayashi leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Virginia Ruzici won the 1982 Tampa fourth round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 70
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 71
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 1982* | Tampa | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Virginia Ruzici | 6-2 7-5 | Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | Match data |
| Feb 26, 1982* | Oakland | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Virginia Ruzici | 6-2 6-1 | Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | Match data |
| Nov 20, 1981* | Perth 2 | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | 7-6 6-3 | Virginia Ruzici | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | — | — | — | 1,924 | 182 | 200 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Virginia Ruzici | #264 | #16 | 5 | 2,121 | 458 | 274 | 62.6% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 20 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | Virginia Ruzici | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 12 | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 13 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1972 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1973 | 28–30 | 48.3% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1974 | 24–13 | 64.9% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1975 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1976 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1977 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 30–20 | 60.0% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1978 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,803 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 23–21 | 52.3% | — | 1,918 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1979 | 26–22 | 54.2% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 59–26 | 69.4% | — | 2,093 | 1 | 8 |
| 24 | 1980 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 52–27 | 65.8% | — | 1,966 | 1 | 8 |
| 25 | 1981 | 23–19 | 54.8% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 73–26 | 73.7% | — | 2,027 | 1 | 12 |
| 26 | 1982 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 61–30 | 67.0% | — | 1,920 | 1 | 14 |
| 27 | 1983 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 49–21 | 70.0% | — | 1,982 | 1 | 18 |
| 28 | 1984 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,905 | 1 | 19 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #44 | 1,780 | 1 | 19 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #48 | 1,786 | 1 | 20 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,734 | 1 | 20 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #143 | 1,658 | 1 | 20 |