H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Ann Lebedeff vs Marjorie Gengler H2H: 0-1

Marjorie Gengler holds a 1–0 lead over Ann Lebedeff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marjorie Gengler leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marjorie Gengler won the 1972 Wilmington round of 32 7-6 (4) 6-0.

H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marjorie Gengler 7-6 (4) 6-0 Ann Lebedeff Match data Aug 17, 1972* R32 Wilmington WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ann Lebedeff 1,500 13 32 28.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Marjorie Gengler 1,593 25 31 44.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Ann Lebedeff Marjorie Gengler
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1968 1–7 12.5% 1,418 0 0 1968 7–5 58.3% 1,517 0 1
1969 4–7 36.4% 1,436 0 0 1969 5–7 41.7% 1,512 0 2
1970 3–7 30.0% 1,427 0 0 1970 5–6 45.5% 1,522 0 2
1972 5–11 31.2% 1,416 0 0 1971 3–5 37.5% 1,537 0 2
1972 2–3 40.0% 1,516 0 2
1973 3–3 50.0% 1,525 0 2
1974 0–1 0.0% 1,521 0 2
1976 0–1 0.0% 1,515 0 2

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Ann Lebedeff Marjorie Gengler
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1968 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1968 3 1 4 75.0% 3 0 3 100.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
1969 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1969 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
1970 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1970 3 3 6 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
1972 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1971 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
1972 2 3 5 40.0%
1973 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1974 0 1 1 0.0%
1976 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 6 15 21 28.6% 4 8 12 33.3% 3 9 12 25.0% Career 4 4 8 50.0% 15 10 25 60.0% 6 17 23 26.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Ann Lebedeff Marjorie Gengler
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1968 1418 93.6 -5 26.3% -1.68 0–3 (0%) +0.45 1968 1517 107.8 +72 +70 -60 60.7% +0.64 1–3 (25%) +0.77
1969 1436 96.2 +7 34.8% -1.48 1–0 +0.72 1969 1513 116.7 +57 +110 -74 46.2% +0.08 0–2 +0.58
1970 1428 106.3 -30 +62 26.3% -1.58 0–1 +0.11 1970 1523 108.3 +91 -73 45.8% +0.04 1–1 +1.02
1972 1417 96.9 +1 +63 +50 36.1% -1.11 1–3 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 97.1 +2.20 1971 1538 111.9 +67 -68 35.3% -0.65 1–0 0–2 0.00
1972 1517 94.0 -72 33.3% -1.55 0–1 1–1 +0.38
1973 1526 107.7 +88 50.0% +0.42 +1.02
1974 1521 99.5 0.0% -5.00 -0.10
1976 1516 99.1 0.0% -3.50 -0.10
Career 1500 97.6 -3 +62 +50 32.0% -1.40 2–7 (22%) 2–3 (40%) 93.7 +7.91 Career 1593 112.7 +66 +88 -69 45.8% -0.13 3–7 (30%) 1–3 (25%) 94.2 +6.49

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.