H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Ann Li vs Anna Blinkova H2H: 1-2
Anna Blinkova holds a 2–1 lead over Ann Li in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anna Blinkova leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Ann Li leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ann Li won the 2025 Charleston second round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 26
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 27
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2025 | Charleston | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Ann Li | 6-4 6-3 | Anna Blinkova | Match data |
| Mar 10, 2023* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Anna Blinkova | 6-1 6-2 | Ann Li | Match data |
| Mar 2, 2023* | Austin | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Anna Blinkova | 6-4 6-4 | Ann Li | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Li | #31 | #29 | 1,625 | 1,845 | 88 | 80 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Anna Blinkova | #102 | #35 | 1,300 | 1,796 | 103 | 155 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ann Li | Anna Blinkova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #138 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #95 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2020 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #98 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2021 | 19–10 | 65.5% | #47 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #61 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2022 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #129 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #154 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2023 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #169 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2024 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #96 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #50 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2025 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #38 | 1,817 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 12–25 | 32.4% | #77 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2026 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #31 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 2025 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #62 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #102 | 1,667 | 0 | 2 |