H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 13:17 UTC
Ann Li vs Sloane Stephens H2H: 2-1
Ann Li holds a 2–1 lead over Sloane Stephens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ann Li leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Ann Li won the 2025 Hobart third round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 26
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 33
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2025 | Hobart | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Ann Li | 7-5 6-1 | Sloane Stephens | Match data |
| Dec 30, 2024 | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Ann Li | 5-7 6-4 6-4 | Sloane Stephens | Match data |
| Sep 19, 2023* | Guadalajara | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Sloane Stephens | 7-5 6-4 | Ann Li | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Li | #31 | #29 | 1,625 | 1,845 | 88 | 80 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Sloane Stephens | #315 | #3 | 5,727 | 1,970 | 298 | 240 | 55.4% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ann Li | Sloane Stephens | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #204 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #96 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #38 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2020 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #98 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #12 | 1,831 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2021 | 19–10 | 65.5% | #47 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2022 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #129 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #30 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2023 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #169 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 21–8 | 72.4% | #35 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2024 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #96 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 15–7 | 68.2% | #13 | 1,879 | 1 | 5 |
| 25 | 2025 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #38 | 1,817 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #6 | 1,931 | 1 | 6 |
| 26 | 2026 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #31 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #25 | 1,789 | 1 | 6 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #39 | 1,642 | 1 | 6 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #65 | 1,762 | 1 | 6 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #37 | 1,784 | 1 | 7 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #47 | 1,799 | 1 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #74 | 1,691 | 1 | 8 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #479 | 1,607 | 1 | 8 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #315 | 1,616 | 1 | 8 |