H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Anna Blinkova vs Barbora Krejcikova H2H: 0-3
Barbora Krejcikova holds a 3–0 lead over Anna Blinkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Barbora Krejcikova leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbora Krejcikova won the 2025 Beijing first round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 27
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 30
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2025 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Barbora Krejcikova | 6-2 6-2 | Anna Blinkova | Match data |
| Jul 28, 2022* | Prague | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Barbora Krejcikova | 6-3 6-1 | Anna Blinkova | Match data |
| Mar 25, 2021* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Barbora Krejcikova | 6-1 3-6 6-3 | Anna Blinkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Blinkova | #102 | #35 | 1,300 | 1,796 | 103 | 155 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Barbora Krejcikova | #32 | #2 | 5,533 | 2,028 | 166 | 101 | 62.2% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Blinkova | Barbora Krejcikova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2017 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #138 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2018 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #95 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2019 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #252 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #61 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #126 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2021 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #154 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2022 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #131 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2023 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #50 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #65 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2024 | 12–25 | 32.4% | #77 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,955 | 1 | 3 |
| 26 | 2025 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #62 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,928 | 1 | 5 |
| 27 | 2026 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #102 | 1,667 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #10 | 1,910 | 1 | 7 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #10 | 1,893 | 2 | 8 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #65 | 1,895 | 2 | 8 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #32 | 1,933 | 2 | 8 |