H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 10:32 UTC
Anna Blinkova vs Kristyna Pliskova H2H: 0-1
Kristyna Pliskova holds a 1–0 lead over Anna Blinkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kristyna Pliskova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kristyna Pliskova won the 2019 Australian Open first round 7-6(2) 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 27
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 34
Left-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2019* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Kristyna Pliskova | 7-6(2) 2-6 6-2 | Anna Blinkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Blinkova | #102 | #35 | 1,300 | 1,796 | 103 | 155 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Kristyna Pliskova | #446 | #35 | 1,343 | 1,756 | 94 | 139 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Blinkova | Kristyna Pliskova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #854 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #748 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2017 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #138 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2018 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #95 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #176 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2019 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #61 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #130 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2021 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #154 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #121 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2022 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2023 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #50 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #60 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2024 | 12–25 | 32.4% | #77 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2025 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #62 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2026 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #102 | 1,667 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #67 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #69 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |