Anna Ivan
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Lou Piatek | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 23, 1989 | H2H |
| Wendy Turnbull | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jan 4, 1989 | H2H |
| Tine Scheuer Larsen | 1 | 1 | 2 | Mar 21, 1989 | H2H |
| Maria Lindstrom | 1 | 1 | 2 | Feb 2, 1989 | H2H |
| Sara Gomer | 1 | 1 | 2 | Aug 10, 1988 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Anna Ivan vs Laura Arraya H2H: 1-0
Anna Ivan holds a 1–0 lead over Laura Arraya in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anna Ivan leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anna Ivan won the 1985 Indianapolis US Clay round of 32 6-3 5-7 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Ivan | 6-3 5-7 7-5 | Laura Arraya | Match data | Jul 24, 1985* | R32 | Indianapolis US Clay | Series Category 4 → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Ivan | — | — | — | 1,690 | 22 | 31 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Laura Arraya | #192 | #14 | 51 | 1,922 | 270 | 204 | 57.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anna Ivan | Laura Arraya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 4 |
| 1985 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 7 |
| 1986 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,712 | 0 | 7 |
| 1988 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #34 | 1,759 | 0 | 8 |
| 1989 | 3–10 | 23.1% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,691 | 0 | 8 |
| 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,718 | 0 | 8 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,821 | 0 | 10 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,823 | 0 | 10 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,732 | 0 | 10 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,682 | 0 | 10 |
Surface Results by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Anna Ivan | Laura Arraya | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1984 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1982 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 23 | 10 | 33 | 69.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1986 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1983 | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 10 | 11 | 21 | 47.6% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 1988 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 19 | 7 | 26 | 73.1% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 1989 | 2 | 9 | 11 | 18.2% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 1990 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 14 | 8 | 22 | 63.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 15 | 3 | 18 | 83.3% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 18 | 12 | 30 | 60.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| Career | 14 | 21 | 35 | 40.0% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | Career | 105 | 80 | 185 | 56.8% | 103 | 73 | 176 | 58.5% | 16 | 14 | 30 | 53.3% | 28 | 31 | 59 | 47.5% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Anna Ivan | Laura Arraya | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1984 | 1514 | 106.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.20 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.08 | 1981 | 1685 | 129.1 | — | — | — | — | -70 | — | — | 65.6% | +0.74 | 5–2 (71%) | 3–1 (75%) | — | -1.24 |
| 1985 | 1572 | 124.5 | — | — | — | — | -1 | +66 | — | 52.0% | +0.16 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–1 | — | +0.52 | 1982 | 1742 | 126.9 | — | — | — | — | -61 | -27 | — | 62.7% | +0.91 | 10–8 (56%) | 8–5 (62%) | — | +2.71 |
| 1986 | 1653 | 123.9 | — | — | — | — | -25 | +10 | — | 44.4% | -0.47 | 6–2 (75%) | 3–1 (75%) | — | -1.74 | 1983 | 1713 | 125.7 | — | — | — | — | +8 | +30 | — | 51.4% | -0.24 | 8–11 (42%) | 3–4 (43%) | — | +0.84 |
| 1988 | 1651 | 115.7 | — | — | — | — | -31 | — | — | 48.0% | -0.16 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.42 | 1984 | 1760 | 130.6 | — | — | — | — | -102 | +141 | -132 | 53.8% | +0.03 | 18–5 (78%) | 9–4 (69%) | — | +0.94 |
| 1989 | 1552 | 103.5 | — | — | — | — | -32 | — | — | 34.4% | -1.28 | 1–5 (17%) | — | — | +0.79 | 1985 | 1692 | 124.9 | — | — | — | — | -2 | +60 | — | 45.1% | -0.27 | 8–7 (53%) | 3–2 (60%) | — | +1.84 |
| 1990 | 1525 | 94.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.12 | 1986 | 1718 | 138.1 | — | — | — | — | -26 | +100 | — | 51.0% | -0.04 | 5–7 (42%) | 5–6 (45%) | — | -1.79 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1770 | 133.4 | — | — | — | — | -31 | -11 | -184 | 51.6% | +0.05 | 3–1 (75%) | 0–3 (0%) | — | -2.60 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1883 | 136.8 | — | — | — | — | -8 | -146 | -254 | 65.2% | +0.79 | 7–4 (64%) | 3–2 (60%) | — | +0.41 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1821 | 141.9 | — | — | — | — | +31 | -55 | -173 | 55.4% | +0.46 | 7–4 (64%) | 5–8 (38%) | — | +0.41 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1823 | 132.7 | — | — | — | — | +13 | -70 | -95 | 56.9% | +0.19 | 10–4 (71%) | 5–4 (56%) | — | +2.96 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1733 | 139.0 | — | — | — | — | +2 | +53 | +3 | 49.4% | +0.06 | 5–6 (45%) | 4–5 (44%) | — | +1.62 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1682 | 125.0 | — | — | — | — | +13 | +124 | +9 | 44.0% | -0.66 | 4–4 (50%) | 2–0 | — | -0.06 |
| Career | 1690 | 120.6 | — | — | — | — | -25 | +32 | — | 42.5% | -0.56 | 11–10 (52%) | 4–2 (67%) | 105.7 | +0.36 | Career | 1923 | 138.4 | — | — | — | — | -10 | +27 | -133 | 54.6% | +0.19 | 90–63 (59%) | 50–44 (53%) | 104.5 | +1.27 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Laura Arraya
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mareen Louie Harper | 5 | 3 | 8 | Jan 31, 1992 | H2H |
| Lori Mcneil | 2 | 5 | 7 | Oct 23, 1992 | H2H |
| Pilar Vasquez | 6 | 1 | 7 | Jan 16, 1991 | H2H |
| Patricia Medrado | 5 | 2 | 7 | Oct 9, 1986 | H2H |
| Akiko Kijimuta | 6 | 0 | 6 | Feb 1, 1992 | H2H |