H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Anna-Lena Groenefeld vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 0-1
Tamira Paszek holds a 1–0 lead over Anna-Lena Groenefeld in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tamira Paszek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tamira Paszek won the 2008 Bali third round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 35
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2008* | Bali | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Tamira Paszek | 7-5 6-4 | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Tamira Paszek | — | — | — | 1,801 | 99 | 128 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Tamira Paszek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 2 |
| 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 2 |
| 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 2–17 | 10.5% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,447 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 3 |