H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Anna Smashnova vs Amanda Coetzer H2H: 0-4
Amanda Coetzer holds a 4–0 lead over Anna Smashnova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Amanda Coetzer leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Amanda Coetzer won the 2003 Australian Open third round 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ISR
Age 50
Right-Handed
157 cm / 5'2"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 54
Right-Handed
158 cm / 5'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2003* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Amanda Coetzer | 6-0 6-2 | Anna Smashnova | Match data |
| Aug 29, 2002* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Amanda Coetzer | 6-2 6-4 | Anna Smashnova | Match data |
| Aug 7, 2002* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Amanda Coetzer | 6-0 6-2 | Anna Smashnova | Match data |
| Jun 23, 2000* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Amanda Coetzer | 6-2 6-0 | Anna Smashnova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Smashnova | #994 | #15 | 1,616 | 1,882 | 242 | 221 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Amanda Coetzer | #289 | #3 | 3,380 | 2,051 | 491 | 307 | 61.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Smashnova | Amanda Coetzer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #236 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #152 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1994 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #47 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #63 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #68 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #76 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #132 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #17 | 1,857 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #49 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #15 | 1,991 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #47 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #18 | 1,885 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2000 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #46 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,910 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2001 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #88 | 1,605 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #14 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2002 | 43–25 | 63.2% | #16 | 1,793 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 60–25 | 70.6% | #4 | 2,013 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2003 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #16 | 1,857 | 0 | 8 | 1998 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #17 | 1,887 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #32 | 1,732 | 0 | 9 | 1999 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #11 | 1,815 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2005 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #43 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 | 2000 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2006 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,700 | 0 | 12 | 2001 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #19 | 1,786 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #921 | 1,648 | 0 | 12 | 2002 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #21 | 1,795 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #25 | 1,738 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #286 | 1,718 | 0 | 9 |