H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Anna Smashnova vs Asa Carlsson H2H: 1-0
Anna Smashnova holds a 1–0 lead over Asa Carlsson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anna Smashnova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anna Smashnova won the 2001 Basle fourth round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ISR
Age 50
Right-Handed
157 cm / 5'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2001* | Basle | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Anna Smashnova | 6-1 6-1 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Smashnova | #994 | #15 | 1,616 | 1,882 | 242 | 221 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Asa Carlsson | #1,024 | #28 | 831 | 1,816 | 128 | 171 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anna Smashnova | Asa Carlsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #236 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #164 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #70 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #47 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #49 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #68 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #39 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #132 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #45 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #49 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #92 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #47 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #61 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #46 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #88 | 1,605 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #102 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 43–25 | 63.2% | #16 | 1,793 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #78 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 |
| 2003 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #16 | 1,857 | 0 | 8 | 2003 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #345 | 1,496 | 0 | 2 |
| 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #32 | 1,732 | 0 | 9 | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #207 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |
| 2005 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #43 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,700 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #921 | 1,648 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |