H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Anna Smashnova vs Chanda Rubin H2H: 2-6

Chanda Rubin holds a 6–2 lead over Anna Smashnova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Chanda Rubin leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 2004 San Diego second round 6-0 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anna Smashnova
ISR Age 50 Right-Handed 157 cm / 5'2"
H2H
2 – 6
8 main draw meetings
Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 28, 2004* San Diego WTA 1000 R64 Hard Chanda Rubin #23 6-0 6-3 Anna Smashnova #17 Match data
Jun 21, 2003* Eastbourne WTA 500 QF Grass Chanda Rubin #7 6-1 6-0 Anna Smashnova #26 Match data
Oct 17, 2002* Zurich WTA 1000 R32 Hard Anna Smashnova #16 6-3 6-3 Chanda Rubin #13 Match data
Jan 19, 2000* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Chanda Rubin #22 6-3 6-4 Anna Smashnova #48 Match data
Nov 11, 1999* Philadelphia WTA 250 R32 Carpet Chanda Rubin #24 6-4 6-4 Anna Smashnova #49 Match data
May 22, 1998* Madrid WTA 1000 R16 Clay Chanda Rubin #78 3-6 6-3 6-2 Anna Smashnova #102 Match data
Mar 30, 1995* Hilton Head WTA 1000 R32 Clay Chanda Rubin #41 5-7 6-3 6-4 Anna Smashnova #43 Match data
Aug 15, 1994 Toronto WTA 1000 R32 Hard Anna Smashnova #61 6-1 6-3 Chanda Rubin #29 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anna Smashnova #994 #15 1,616 1,882 242 221 52.3% 0 0 0 0 12 12
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anna Smashnova Chanda Rubin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1991 0–1 0.0% #264 1,492 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0
15 1992 1–2 33.3% #236 1,489 0 0 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0
16 1993 0–1 0.0% #139 1,485 0 0 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0
17 1994 10–11 47.6% #47 1,599 0 0 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0
18 1995 8–12 40.0% #68 1,574 0 0 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0
19 1996 4–11 26.7% #132 1,560 0 0 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0
21 1998 12–14 46.2% #49 1,582 0 0 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1
22 1999 21–23 47.7% #47 1,637 0 1 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1
23 2000 25–23 52.1% #46 1,668 0 2 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2
24 2001 13–19 40.6% #88 1,605 0 2 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3
25 2002 43–25 63.2% #16 1,793 0 6 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3
26 2003 37–21 63.8% #16 1,857 0 8 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5
27 2004 28–23 54.9% #32 1,732 0 9 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7
28 2005 24–16 60.0% #43 1,745 0 11 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7
29 2006 16–16 50.0% #63 1,700 0 12 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7
30 2007 0–3 0.0% #921 1,648 0 12 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7