H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Anna Smashnova vs Fang Li H2H: 0-2

Fang Li holds a 2–0 lead over Anna Smashnova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Fang Li leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fang Li won the 1996 ASB Classic round of 32 6-1 6-7 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anna Smashnova
ISR Age 50 Right-Handed 157 cm / 5'2"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Fang Li
CHN Age 53 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Fang Li #108 6-1 6-7 6-1 Anna Smashnova #72 Match data Jan 4, 1996* R32 ASB Classic Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Fang Li #81 6-4 5-7 6-2 Anna Smashnova #60 Match data Jul 8, 1994* R32 Palermo Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anna Smashnova #994 #15 1,616 1,881 242 222 52.2% 0 0 0 0 12 12
Fang Li #488 #36 723 1,707 67 90 42.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anna Smashnova Fang Li
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1991 0–1 0.0% #264 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1992 1–2 33.3% #236 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1993 0–1 0.0% #139 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1994 10–11 47.6% #47 1,600 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1995 8–12 40.0% #68 1,577 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1996 4–11 26.7% #132 1,562 0 0 1992 5–8 38.5% #119 1,543 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1993 6–12 33.3% #132 1,529 0 0
21 1998 12–14 46.2% #49 1,583 0 0 1994 13–13 50.0% #67 1,608 0 0
22 1999 21–23 47.7% #47 1,636 0 1 1995 9–8 52.9% #93 1,622 0 0
23 2000 25–23 52.1% #46 1,669 0 2 1996 3–5 37.5% #199 1,591 0 0
24 2001 13–19 40.6% #88 1,605 0 2 1997 2–3 40.0% #69 1,599 0 0
25 2002 43–25 63.2% #16 1,794 0 6 1998 23–24 48.9% #40 1,676 0 0
26 2003 37–21 63.8% #16 1,856 0 8 1999 6–12 33.3% #86 1,585 0 0
27 2004 28–24 53.8% #32 1,709 0 9 2000 0–2 0.0% #503 1,542 0 0
28 2005 24–16 60.0% #43 1,738 0 11 2001 0–3 0.0% #488 1,500 0 0
29 2006 16–16 50.0% #63 1,698 0 12 — — — — — — —
30 2007 0–3 0.0% #921 1,646 0 12 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anna Smashnova Fang Li
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1991 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1992 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1993 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1994 7 4 11 63.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 3 5 8 37.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1992 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 4 7 11 36.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 1998 3 6 9 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1994 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1999 10 8 18 55.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1995 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2000 7 11 18 38.9% 14 7 21 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1996 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2001 2 7 9 22.2% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1997 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2002 28 14 42 66.7% 15 8 23 65.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 12 12 24 50.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2003 12 9 21 57.1% 20 7 27 74.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1999 4 5 9 44.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 2004 12 13 25 48.0% 16 7 23 69.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2000 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 6 6 12 50.0% 18 7 25 72.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2006 4 7 11 36.4% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 98 99 197 49.7% 132 81 213 62.0% 6 21 27 22.2% 6 21 27 22.2% — 46 55 101 45.5% 17 21 38 44.7% 1 7 8 12.5% 3 7 10 30.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anna Smashnova Fang Li
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1991 1492 99.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1992 1489 98.0 — — — — +33 — — 37.5% -1.50 1–1 1–0 — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1993 1486 98.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1994 1600 126.0 — — — — +9 -40 — 46.0% -0.46 4–4 (50%) 0–1 — +0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 1578 118.0 — — — — +7 +20 — 42.9% -0.38 2–2 (50%) 1–5 (17%) 97.0 +1.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1562 121.4 — — — — +39 -21 — 32.4% -1.14 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — -1.26 1992 1544 119.3 — — — — +55 — — 39.3% -0.68 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.13
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1529 112.6 — — — — +30 +31 — 33.3% -1.36 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.54
21 1998 1583 118.4 — — — — -14 +56 — 50.0% -0.14 4–8 (33%) 7–0 (100%) 102.4 +0.55 1994 1609 120.8 — — — — -10 +8 — 49.2% -0.22 4–5 (44%) 2–1 (67%) 101.0 +0.90
22 1999 1636 138.3 — — — — -5 +52 — 48.5% -0.03 7–8 (47%) 3–5 (38%) 99.1 +0.50 1995 1623 122.6 — — — — -4 — — 55.3% +0.32 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +0.34
23 2000 1669 125.9 — — — — -101 +130 -144 50.0% +0.02 6–2 (75%) 4–5 (44%) 103.6 +1.10 1996 1592 112.9 — — — — +22 — — 38.1% -0.48 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 97.6 +0.31
24 2001 1605 116.1 — — — — -128 +190 — 41.3% -0.43 6–5 (55%) 4–2 (67%) 102.2 +0.41 1997 1600 118.4 — — — — +20 — — 45.5% 0.00 0–1 0–2 — +0.54
25 2002 1794 147.7 — — — — -18 +92 — 60.0% +0.67 12–7 (63%) 8–2 (80%) 109.9 +0.08 1998 1676 134.1 — — — — +38 -58 — 49.0% -0.06 6–4 (60%) 6–2 (75%) 107.9 +1.15
26 2003 1857 141.4 +0.50 +0.98 1.045 51.1% -69 +127 -365 60.2% +0.59 11–7 (61%) 7–4 (64%) 104.0 -0.34 1999 1586 117.9 — — — — +101 -16 — 37.8% -0.59 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.9 -0.13
27 2004 1710 136.5 -2.30 +0.59 0.788 43.9% -59 +259 — 55.7% +0.50 7–3 (70%) 4–3 (57%) 102.3 +1.59 2000 1542 89.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — +0.39
28 2005 1739 136.2 -2.91 +0.20 0.837 45.6% -103 +249 — 59.5% +0.79 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.25 2001 1500 92.6 — — — — +80 — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — 0.00
29 2006 1698 126.6 -3.06 -0.34 0.879 46.7% -96 +184 — 52.2% +0.22 5–6 (45%) — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 1646 92.0 +0.35 -1.43 0.805 44.6% — — — 0.0% -4.33 — — — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1882 137.9 -2.28 +0.04 0.879 46.8% -46 +137 -242 51.8% +0.13 70–61 (53%) 40–30 (57%) 105.3 +0.96 — 1707 127.8 — — — — +28 -30 — 44.1% -0.42 22–21 (51%) 14–15 (48%) 100.5 +1.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.