H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Anna Smashnova vs Gigi Fernandez H2H: 0-1

Gigi Fernandez holds a 1–0 lead over Anna Smashnova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gigi Fernandez leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Gigi Fernandez won the 1994 Brighton round of 32 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anna Smashnova
ISR Age 50 Right-Handed 157 cm / 5'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Gigi Fernandez
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gigi Fernandez #38 6-4 6-2 Anna Smashnova #45 Match data Oct 20, 1994* R32 Brighton Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anna Smashnova #994 #15 1,616 1,881 242 222 52.2% 0 0 0 0 12 12
Gigi Fernandez #181 #17 247 1,911 227 217 51.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anna Smashnova Gigi Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1991 0–1 0.0% #264 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1992 1–2 33.3% #236 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1993 0–1 0.0% #139 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1994 10–11 47.6% #47 1,600 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1995 8–12 40.0% #68 1,577 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
19 1996 4–11 26.7% #132 1,562 0 0 1983 4–8 33.3% — 1,524 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1984 18–16 52.9% #27 1,722 0 0
21 1998 12–14 46.2% #49 1,583 0 0 1985 9–18 33.3% #64 1,655 0 0
22 1999 21–23 47.7% #47 1,636 0 1 1986 17–14 54.8% #57 1,728 0 1
23 2000 25–23 52.1% #46 1,669 0 2 1987 16–17 48.5% #39 1,681 0 1
24 2001 13–19 40.6% #88 1,605 0 2 1988 15–18 45.5% #53 1,683 0 1
25 2002 43–25 63.2% #16 1,794 0 6 1989 23–15 60.5% #23 1,808 0 1
26 2003 37–21 63.8% #16 1,856 0 8 1990 18–14 56.2% #36 1,764 0 1
27 2004 28–24 53.8% #32 1,709 0 9 1991 30–18 62.5% #22 1,808 0 2
28 2005 24–16 60.0% #43 1,738 0 11 1992 22–16 57.9% #32 1,806 0 2
29 2006 16–16 50.0% #63 1,698 0 12 1993 17–17 50.0% #50 1,730 0 2
30 2007 0–3 0.0% #921 1,646 0 12 1994 17–17 50.0% #32 1,789 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1995 11–13 45.8% #65 1,739 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 1996 7–12 36.8% #112 1,687 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 1997 3–3 50.0% #180 1,708 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anna Smashnova Gigi Fernandez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1991 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1992 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1993 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1994 7 4 11 63.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 3 5 8 37.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1983 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 10 5 15 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0%
21 1998 3 6 9 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1985 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 1999 10 8 18 55.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1986 10 4 14 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 2000 7 11 18 38.9% 14 7 21 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1987 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
24 2001 2 7 9 22.2% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1988 12 12 24 50.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2002 28 14 42 66.7% 15 8 23 65.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 14 10 24 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2003 12 9 21 57.1% 20 7 27 74.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1990 12 8 20 60.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
27 2004 12 13 25 48.0% 16 7 23 69.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1991 17 10 27 63.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
28 2005 6 6 12 50.0% 18 7 25 72.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 16 8 24 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
29 2006 4 7 11 36.4% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 8 7 15 53.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
30 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1994 9 8 17 52.9% 0 5 5 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
Career — 98 99 197 49.7% 132 81 213 62.0% 6 21 27 22.2% 6 21 27 22.2% — 123 108 231 53.2% 10 21 31 32.3% 66 48 114 57.9% 28 38 66 42.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anna Smashnova Gigi Fernandez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1991 1492 99.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1992 1489 98.0 — — — — +33 — — 37.5% -1.50 1–1 1–0 — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1993 1486 98.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1994 1600 126.0 — — — — +9 -40 — 46.0% -0.46 4–4 (50%) 0–1 — +0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 1578 118.0 — — — — +7 +20 — 42.9% -0.38 2–2 (50%) 1–5 (17%) 97.0 +1.76 1982 1484 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.14
19 1996 1562 121.4 — — — — +39 -21 — 32.4% -1.14 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — -1.26 1983 1525 107.0 — — — — +20 — +103 38.7% -0.81 3–4 (43%) — — +0.09
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1723 133.3 — — — — -124 — +67 52.6% +0.51 4–6 (40%) 3–6 (33%) 97.5 +1.64
21 1998 1583 118.4 — — — — -14 +56 — 50.0% -0.14 4–8 (33%) 7–0 (100%) 102.4 +0.55 1985 1655 131.5 — — — — -67 — +69 36.7% -1.17 2–4 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 102.0 -1.65
22 1999 1636 138.3 — — — — -5 +52 — 48.5% -0.03 7–8 (47%) 3–5 (38%) 99.1 +0.50 1986 1729 123.4 — — — — -5 -186 -44 55.4% +0.18 5–7 (42%) 5–2 (71%) 99.5 +2.46
23 2000 1669 125.9 — — — — -101 +130 -144 50.0% +0.02 6–2 (75%) 4–5 (44%) 103.6 +1.10 1987 1681 134.9 — — — — -1 -163 +66 49.3% +0.08 4–3 (57%) 3–3 (50%) 102.3 +0.81
24 2001 1605 116.1 — — — — -128 +190 — 41.3% -0.43 6–5 (55%) 4–2 (67%) 102.2 +0.41 1988 1683 137.1 — — — — +26 — -6 47.5% +0.06 8–8 (50%) 3–7 (30%) 97.1 -1.31
25 2002 1794 147.7 — — — — -18 +92 — 60.0% +0.67 12–7 (63%) 8–2 (80%) 109.9 +0.08 1989 1809 145.5 — — — — +2 — -63 57.3% +0.71 8–5 (62%) 4–3 (57%) 103.4 -0.49
26 2003 1857 141.4 +0.50 +0.98 1.045 51.1% -69 +127 -365 60.2% +0.59 11–7 (61%) 7–4 (64%) 104.0 -0.34 1990 1764 137.4 — — — — +14 — +11 57.5% +0.63 3–6 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 95.2 +0.43
27 2004 1710 136.5 -2.30 +0.59 0.788 43.9% -59 +259 — 55.7% +0.50 7–3 (70%) 4–3 (57%) 102.3 +1.59 1991 1809 133.9 — — — — -40 -257 +45 57.7% +0.35 11–4 (73%) 7–4 (64%) 107.7 +1.36
28 2005 1739 136.2 -2.91 +0.20 0.837 45.6% -103 +249 — 59.5% +0.79 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.25 1992 1806 140.7 — — — — +7 -254 +46 56.0% +0.52 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 105.7 +0.99
29 2006 1698 126.6 -3.06 -0.34 0.879 46.7% -96 +184 — 52.2% +0.22 5–6 (45%) — — +0.02 1993 1731 133.0 — — — — -6 -139 +171 50.7% -0.20 5–4 (56%) 5–2 (71%) 102.5 +1.15
30 2007 1646 92.0 +0.35 -1.43 0.805 44.6% — — — 0.0% -4.33 — — — -0.08 1994 1790 139.1 — — — — -26 -264 +163 51.9% -0.05 4–7 (36%) 5–6 (45%) 95.7 -0.06
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1739 124.8 — — — — -25 — +142 50.9% -0.33 4–7 (36%) 4–2 (67%) 98.5 -0.33
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1688 129.4 — — — — -30 — +235 40.0% -0.84 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — -0.64
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1709 113.2 — — — — -56 — +219 46.2% -0.54 1–0 1–1 — -0.50
Career — 1882 137.9 -2.28 +0.04 0.879 46.8% -46 +137 -242 51.8% +0.13 70–61 (53%) 40–30 (57%) 105.3 +0.96 — 1912 141.7 — — — — -18 -208 +72 51.5% +0.08 72–72 (50%) 52–42 (55%) 103.1 +0.92

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.