H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Anna Smashnova vs Iva Majoli H2H: 1-2

Iva Majoli holds a 2–1 lead over Anna Smashnova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Iva Majoli leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Iva Majoli won the 2002 Charleston Open round of 16 6-1 3-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anna Smashnova
ISR Age 50 Right-Handed 157 cm / 5'2"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Iva Majoli
CRO Age 49 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Iva Majoli #58 6-1 3-6 6-2 Anna Smashnova #35 Match data Apr 19, 2002* R16 Charleston Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Anna Smashnova #40 6-3 6-1 Iva Majoli #466 Match data Apr 12, 2000* R64 Amelia Island Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Iva Majoli #23 6-2 6-3 Anna Smashnova #54 Match data Sep 4, 1994* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anna Smashnova #994 #15 1,616 1,881 242 222 52.2% 0 0 0 0 12 12
Iva Majoli #777 #4 3,406 2,155 262 192 57.7% 1 3 0 4 0 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anna Smashnova Iva Majoli
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1991 0–1 0.0% #264 1,491 0 0 1992 7–6 53.8% #50 1,624 0 0
15 1992 1–2 33.3% #236 1,489 0 0 1993 13–13 50.0% #46 1,735 0 0
16 1993 0–1 0.0% #139 1,485 0 0 1994 38–19 66.7% #13 1,921 0 0
17 1994 10–11 47.6% #47 1,600 0 0 1995 29–12 70.7% #9 2,045 0 2
18 1995 8–12 40.0% #68 1,577 0 0 1996 42–17 71.2% #7 2,038 0 4
19 1996 4–11 26.7% #132 1,562 0 0 1997 43–21 67.2% #6 1,946 1 7
20 — — — — — — — 1998 23–20 53.5% #25 1,828 1 7
21 1998 12–14 46.2% #49 1,583 0 0 1999 5–11 31.2% #164 1,694 1 7
22 1999 21–23 47.7% #47 1,636 0 1 2000 11–11 50.0% #62 1,695 1 7
23 2000 25–23 52.1% #46 1,669 0 2 2001 20–22 47.6% #44 1,697 1 7
24 2001 13–19 40.6% #88 1,605 0 2 2002 23–22 51.1% #32 1,667 1 8
25 2002 43–25 63.2% #16 1,794 0 6 2003 7–15 31.8% #131 1,606 1 8
26 2003 37–21 63.8% #16 1,856 0 8 2004 1–3 25.0% #321 1,579 1 8
27 2004 28–24 53.8% #32 1,709 0 9 — — — — — — —
28 2005 24–16 60.0% #43 1,738 0 11 — — — — — — —
29 2006 16–16 50.0% #63 1,698 0 12 — — — — — — —
30 2007 0–3 0.0% #921 1,646 0 12 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anna Smashnova Iva Majoli
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1991 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 3 4 7 42.9% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
15 1992 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 4 6 10 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
16 1993 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1994 16 7 23 69.6% 13 5 18 72.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
17 1994 7 4 11 63.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1995 14 3 17 82.4% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
18 1995 3 5 8 37.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1996 10 6 16 62.5% 15 6 21 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 15 4 19 78.9%
19 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1997 8 9 17 47.1% 19 4 23 82.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 12 6 18 66.7%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 6 5 11 54.5% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7%
21 1998 3 6 9 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1999 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1999 10 8 18 55.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2000 5 5 10 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 2000 7 11 18 38.9% 14 7 21 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2001 11 11 22 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
24 2001 2 7 9 22.2% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2002 7 12 19 36.8% 14 7 21 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2002 28 14 42 66.7% 15 8 23 65.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 0 6 6 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2003 12 9 21 57.1% 20 7 27 74.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2004 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2004 12 13 25 48.0% 16 7 23 69.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 6 6 12 50.0% 18 7 25 72.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 4 7 11 36.4% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 98 99 197 49.7% 132 81 213 62.0% 6 21 27 22.2% 6 21 27 22.2% — 85 81 166 51.2% 105 58 163 64.4% 11 10 21 52.4% 61 43 104 58.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anna Smashnova Iva Majoli
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1991 1492 99.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.10 1992 1624 131.4 — — — — -1 -35 — 50.0% -0.17 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — -0.26
15 1992 1489 98.0 — — — — +33 — — 37.5% -1.50 1–1 1–0 — +0.20 1993 1736 154.2 — — — — -24 -82 — 51.7% +0.21 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.6 -0.69
16 1993 1486 98.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.27 1994 1922 155.6 — — — — -47 -71 -318 58.8% +0.37 18–6 (75%) 10–2 (83%) 116.4 -1.10
17 1994 1600 126.0 — — — — +9 -40 — 46.0% -0.46 4–4 (50%) 0–1 — +0.52 1995 2046 165.8 — — — — 0 -128 — 66.7% +1.21 8–6 (57%) 8–2 (80%) 107.5 -0.04
18 1995 1578 118.0 — — — — +7 +20 — 42.9% -0.38 2–2 (50%) 1–5 (17%) 97.0 +1.76 1996 2038 166.9 — — — — +33 -42 -404 65.7% +0.63 13–8 (62%) 11–4 (73%) 105.7 -1.43
19 1996 1562 121.4 — — — — +39 -21 — 32.4% -1.14 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — -1.26 1997 1946 159.5 — — — — -16 +184 -241 60.5% +0.66 20–9 (69%) 10–9 (53%) 106.3 +1.31
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1829 148.6 — — — — -4 +251 — 52.7% 0.00 6–5 (55%) 7–4 (64%) 99.1 -0.16
21 1998 1583 118.4 — — — — -14 +56 — 50.0% -0.14 4–8 (33%) 7–0 (100%) 102.4 +0.55 1999 1694 121.9 — — — — +5 +287 — 35.1% -1.08 2–3 (40%) 0–1 — +0.20
22 1999 1636 138.3 — — — — -5 +52 — 48.5% -0.03 7–8 (47%) 3–5 (38%) 99.1 +0.50 2000 1695 114.9 — — — — -4 +192 — 42.3% -0.77 8–2 (80%) 2–3 (40%) 102.6 -0.36
23 2000 1669 125.9 — — — — -101 +130 -144 50.0% +0.02 6–2 (75%) 4–5 (44%) 103.6 +1.10 2001 1697 138.2 — — — — +23 +107 — 49.5% -0.19 6–7 (46%) 6–7 (46%) 98.7 -0.47
24 2001 1605 116.1 — — — — -128 +190 — 41.3% -0.43 6–5 (55%) 4–2 (67%) 102.2 +0.41 2002 1668 129.8 — — — — -45 +156 +61 51.9% -0.21 8–10 (44%) 6–4 (60%) 95.6 +0.77
25 2002 1794 147.7 — — — — -18 +92 — 60.0% +0.67 12–7 (63%) 8–2 (80%) 109.9 +0.08 2003 1607 113.3 -3.85 -1.53 0.641 40.0% -55 +133 — 35.3% -1.04 5–4 (56%) 0–3 (0%) 96.9 -0.94
26 2003 1857 141.4 +0.50 +0.98 1.045 51.1% -69 +127 -365 60.2% +0.59 11–7 (61%) 7–4 (64%) 104.0 -0.34 2004 1579 102.6 — — — — -48 — — 33.3% -0.56 0–1 — — -0.23
27 2004 1710 136.5 -2.30 +0.59 0.788 43.9% -59 +259 — 55.7% +0.50 7–3 (70%) 4–3 (57%) 102.3 +1.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 1739 136.2 -2.91 +0.20 0.837 45.6% -103 +249 — 59.5% +0.79 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 1698 126.6 -3.06 -0.34 0.879 46.7% -96 +184 — 52.2% +0.22 5–6 (45%) — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 1646 92.0 +0.35 -1.43 0.805 44.6% — — — 0.0% -4.33 — — — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1882 137.9 -2.28 +0.04 0.879 46.8% -46 +137 -242 51.8% +0.13 70–61 (53%) 40–30 (57%) 105.3 +0.96 — 2155 156.1 -3.85 -1.53 0.641 40.0% -9 +79 -234 55.0% +0.17 99–66 (60%) 62–43 (59%) 109.1 -0.75

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.