H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Anna Smashnova vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 0-1

Kimiko Date Krumm holds a 1–0 lead over Anna Smashnova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kimiko Date Krumm leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 1994 Toronto fourth round 4-6 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anna Smashnova
ISR Age 50 Right-Handed 157 cm / 5'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 15, 1994 Toronto WTA 1000 R16 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 4-6 6-2 6-1 Anna Smashnova #61 Match data

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anna Smashnova #994 #15 1,616 1,882 242 221 52.3% 0 0 0 0 12 12
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anna Smashnova Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1991 0–1 0.0% #264 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1992 1–2 33.3% #236 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1993 0–1 0.0% #139 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1994 10–11 47.6% #47 1,599 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1995 8–12 40.0% #68 1,574 0 0 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 1996 4–11 26.7% #132 1,560 0 0 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 1998 12–14 46.2% #49 1,582 0 0 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 1999 21–23 47.7% #47 1,637 0 1 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 2000 25–23 52.1% #46 1,668 0 2 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 2001 13–19 40.6% #88 1,605 0 2 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 2002 43–25 63.2% #16 1,793 0 6 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
26 2003 37–21 63.8% #16 1,857 0 8 — — — — — — —
27 2004 28–23 54.9% #32 1,732 0 9 — — — — — — —
28 2005 24–16 60.0% #43 1,745 0 11 — — — — — — —
29 2006 16–16 50.0% #63 1,700 0 12 — — — — — — —
30 2007 0–3 0.0% #921 1,648 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8