H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Anna Smashnova vs Larisa Savchenko H2H: 2-1
Anna Smashnova holds a 2–1 lead over Larisa Savchenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anna Smashnova leads 1–0 on clay, while Larisa Savchenko leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anna Smashnova won the 1999 Hope Island third round 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ISR
Age 50
Right-Handed
157 cm / 5'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
URS
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 1999* | Hope Island | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Anna Smashnova | 6-0 6-3 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
| May 27, 1998* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Anna Smashnova | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
| Jun 24, 1994* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Larisa Savchenko | 6-3 6-4 | Anna Smashnova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Smashnova | #994 | #15 | 1,616 | 1,882 | 242 | 221 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Larisa Savchenko | #305 | #13 | 454 | 1,926 | 238 | 239 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anna Smashnova | Larisa Savchenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #236 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #55 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #47 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #68 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #132 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #49 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,887 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #47 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #91 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #46 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #88 | 1,605 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 43–25 | 63.2% | #16 | 1,793 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 2003 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #16 | 1,857 | 0 | 8 | 1994 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #41 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 |
| 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #32 | 1,732 | 0 | 9 | 1995 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #99 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 2005 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #43 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 | 1996 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #61 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 2006 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,700 | 0 | 12 | 1997 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #921 | 1,648 | 0 | 12 | 1998 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 |