H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Anna Smashnova vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 1-0
Anna Smashnova holds a 1–0 lead over Lori Mcneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anna Smashnova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna Smashnova won the 1994 US Open first round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ISR
Age 50
Right-Handed
157 cm / 5'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 1994* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Anna Smashnova | 6-2 6-4 | Lori Mcneil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Smashnova | #994 | #15 | 1,616 | 1,882 | 242 | 221 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Lori Mcneil | #867 | #9 | 303 | 2,032 | 377 | 273 | 58.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Smashnova | Lori Mcneil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #236 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1994 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #47 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #68 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #132 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #97 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1998 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #49 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #93 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #47 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,884 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2000 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #46 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 54–24 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,017 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2001 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #88 | 1,605 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 46–20 | 69.7% | #13 | 1,904 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2002 | 43–25 | 63.2% | #16 | 1,793 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #36 | 1,760 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2003 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #16 | 1,857 | 0 | 8 | 1990 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #52 | 1,696 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #32 | 1,732 | 0 | 9 | 1991 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #19 | 1,870 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2005 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #43 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 | 1992 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #15 | 1,962 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 2006 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,700 | 0 | 12 | 1993 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #25 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #921 | 1,648 | 0 | 12 | 1994 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #17 | 1,871 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #34 | 1,804 | 0 | 11 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #83 | 1,726 | 0 | 11 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #301 | 1,655 | 0 | 11 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #91 | 1,717 | 0 | 11 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #869 | 1,669 | 0 | 11 |