H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Anna Smashnova vs Martina Hingis H2H: 0-2
Martina Hingis holds a 2–0 lead over Anna Smashnova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Martina Hingis leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 2002 New Haven third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ISR
Age 50
Right-Handed
157 cm / 5'2"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 45
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2002* | New Haven | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-4 6-4 | Anna Smashnova | Match data |
| Jun 2, 1998* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Martina Hingis | 6-1 6-2 | Anna Smashnova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Smashnova | #994 | #15 | 1,616 | 1,882 | 242 | 221 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Martina Hingis | #19 | #1 | 6,976 | 2,385 | 515 | 126 | 80.3% | 5 | 18 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 43 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Smashnova | Martina Hingis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #236 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,160 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 72–5 | 93.5% | #1 | 2,321 | 3 | 14 |
| 17 | 1994 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #47 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 60–12 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 4 | 19 |
| 18 | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #68 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 70–12 | 85.4% | #1 | 2,285 | 5 | 26 |
| 19 | 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #132 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 78–10 | 88.6% | #1 | 2,314 | 5 | 35 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,123 | 5 | 38 |
| 21 | 1998 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #49 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 34–10 | 77.3% | #10 | 2,050 | 5 | 40 |
| 22 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #47 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2000 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #46 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2001 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #88 | 1,605 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 2,020 | 5 | 40 |
| 25 | 2002 | 43–25 | 63.2% | #16 | 1,793 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #7 | 2,013 | 5 | 42 |
| 26 | 2003 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #16 | 1,857 | 0 | 8 | 2007 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,855 | 5 | 43 |
| 27 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #32 | 1,732 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #43 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,700 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #921 | 1,648 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |