H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Anna Smashnova vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 0-1

Mary Joe Fernandez holds a 1–0 lead over Anna Smashnova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mary Joe Fernandez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Joe Fernandez won the 1996 Indian Wells third round 6-0 2-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anna Smashnova
ISR Age 50 Right-Handed 157 cm / 5'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Mary Joe Fernandez
Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 11, 1996* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #13 6-0 2-6 6-1 Anna Smashnova #78 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anna Smashnova #994 #15 1,616 1,882 242 221 52.3% 0 0 0 0 12 12
Mary Joe Fernandez #136 #4 2,114 2,191 409 192 68.1% 0 3 0 1 3 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anna Smashnova Mary Joe Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 — — — — — — — 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
13 — — — — — — — 1985 5–6 45.5% #99 1,554 0 0
14 1991 0–1 0.0% #264 1,492 0 0 1986 18–14 56.2% #27 1,764 0 0
15 1992 1–2 33.3% #236 1,489 0 0 1987 24–14 63.2% #20 1,895 0 0
16 1993 0–1 0.0% #139 1,485 0 0 1988 22–11 66.7% #15 1,922 0 0
17 1994 10–11 47.6% #47 1,599 0 0 1989 32–15 68.1% #12 1,977 0 0
18 1995 8–12 40.0% #68 1,574 0 0 1990 40–10 80.0% #4 2,123 0 2
19 1996 4–11 26.7% #132 1,560 0 0 1991 47–18 72.3% #8 2,062 0 2
20 — — — — — — — 1992 47–16 74.6% #6 2,108 0 2
21 1998 12–14 46.2% #49 1,582 0 0 1993 34–13 72.3% #7 2,054 0 3
22 1999 21–23 47.7% #47 1,637 0 1 1994 21–9 70.0% #14 1,975 0 4
23 2000 25–23 52.1% #46 1,668 0 2 1995 29–11 72.5% #8 2,038 0 6
24 2001 13–19 40.6% #88 1,605 0 2 1996 26–15 63.4% #16 1,926 0 6
25 2002 43–25 63.2% #16 1,793 0 6 1997 39–16 70.9% #10 1,987 0 7
26 2003 37–21 63.8% #16 1,857 0 8 1998 8–8 50.0% #77 1,932 0 7
27 2004 28–23 54.9% #32 1,732 0 9 1999 17–13 56.7% #38 1,890 0 7
28 2005 24–16 60.0% #43 1,745 0 11 2000 0–1 0.0% #136 1,869 0 7
29 2006 16–16 50.0% #63 1,700 0 12 — — — — — — —
30 2007 0–3 0.0% #921 1,648 0 12 — — — — — — —