H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Anna Smashnova vs Monica Seles H2H: 0-2

Monica Seles holds a 2–0 lead over Anna Smashnova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Monica Seles leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 2002 Madrid quarterfinal 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anna Smashnova
ISR Age 50 Right-Handed 157 cm / 5'2"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Monica Seles
USA Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 25, 2002* Madrid WTA 1000 QF Clay Monica Seles #6 6-3 6-2 Anna Smashnova #24 Match data
Apr 13, 2000* Amelia Island WTA 500 R32 Clay Monica Seles #9 7-6(0) 6-0 Anna Smashnova #40 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anna Smashnova #994 #15 1,616 1,882 242 221 52.3% 0 0 0 0 12 12
Monica Seles #223 #1 4,056 2,540 578 121 82.7% 9 12 3 7 22 53

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anna Smashnova Monica Seles
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1991 0–1 0.0% #264 1,492 0 0 1988 5–3 62.5% #86 1,600 0 0
15 1992 1–2 33.3% #236 1,489 0 0 1989 33–9 78.6% #6 2,002 0 1
16 1993 0–1 0.0% #139 1,485 0 0 1990 55–6 90.2% #2 2,295 1 10
17 1994 10–11 47.6% #47 1,599 0 0 1991 74–6 92.5% #1 2,443 4 20
18 1995 8–12 40.0% #68 1,574 0 0 1992 70–5 93.3% #1 2,499 7 30
19 1996 4–11 26.7% #132 1,560 0 0 1993 17–2 89.5% #8 2,485 8 32
21 1998 12–14 46.2% #49 1,582 0 0 1995 11–1 91.7% #1 2,487 8 33
22 1999 21–23 47.7% #47 1,637 0 1 1996 43–8 84.3% #2 2,342 9 38
23 2000 25–23 52.1% #46 1,668 0 2 1997 45–14 76.3% #5 2,159 9 41
24 2001 13–19 40.6% #88 1,605 0 2 1998 42–13 76.4% #6 2,174 9 43
25 2002 43–25 63.2% #16 1,793 0 6 1999 36–12 75.0% #6 2,116 9 44
26 2003 37–21 63.8% #16 1,857 0 8 2000 51–12 81.0% #4 2,144 9 47
27 2004 28–23 54.9% #32 1,732 0 9 2001 40–10 80.0% #10 2,127 9 51
28 2005 24–16 60.0% #43 1,745 0 11 2002 46–13 78.0% #7 2,088 9 53
29 2006 16–16 50.0% #63 1,700 0 12 2003 10–7 58.8% #60 1,993 9 53
30 2007 0–3 0.0% #921 1,648 0 12 — — — — — — —