H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anna Smashnova vs Nathalie Tauziat H2H: 0-1

Nathalie Tauziat holds a 1–0 lead over Anna Smashnova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nathalie Tauziat leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nathalie Tauziat won the 1996 Berlin Open round of 32 6-4 6-3.

ISR Age 50 Right-Handed 157 cm / 5'2"
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
FRA Age 58 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nathalie Tauziat #21 6-4 6-3 Anna Smashnova #82 Match data May 16, 1996* R32 Berlin Open Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anna Smashnova #994 #15 1,616 1,881 242 222 52.2% 0 0 0 0 12 12
Nathalie Tauziat #126 #3 2,562 2,033 548 333 62.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anna Smashnova Nathalie Tauziat
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1991 0–1 0.0% #264 1,491 0 0
15 1992 1–2 33.3% #236 1,489 0 0
16 1993 0–1 0.0% #139 1,485 0 0 1984 0–1 0.0% #296 1,499 0 0
17 1994 10–11 47.6% #47 1,600 0 0 1985 3–3 50.0% #112 1,539 0 0
18 1995 8–12 40.0% #68 1,577 0 0 1986 12–17 41.4% #66 1,643 0 0
19 1996 4–11 26.7% #132 1,562 0 0 1987 32–20 61.5% #25 1,821 0 0
20 1988 31–20 60.8% #26 1,849 0 0
21 1998 12–14 46.2% #49 1,583 0 0 1989 32–19 62.7% #25 1,875 0 0
22 1999 21–23 47.7% #47 1,636 0 1 1990 46–20 69.7% #18 1,962 0 1
23 2000 25–23 52.1% #46 1,669 0 2 1991 38–20 65.5% #13 1,987 0 1
24 2001 13–19 40.6% #88 1,605 0 2 1992 39–20 66.1% #14 1,934 0 1
25 2002 43–25 63.2% #16 1,794 0 6 1993 41–18 69.5% #18 1,975 0 2
26 2003 37–21 63.8% #16 1,856 0 8 1994 29–21 58.0% #35 1,850 0 2
27 2004 28–24 53.8% #32 1,709 0 9 1995 27–19 58.7% #27 1,845 0 3
28 2005 24–16 60.0% #43 1,738 0 11 1996 30–22 57.7% #22 1,799 0 3
29 2006 16–16 50.0% #63 1,698 0 12 1997 40–21 65.6% #11 1,977 0 4
30 2007 0–3 0.0% #921 1,646 0 12 1998 41–23 64.1% #10 2,025 0 4
31 1999 37–23 61.7% #7 1,988 0 6
32 2000 36–25 59.0% #10 1,869 0 7
33 2001 34–21 61.8% #13 1,864 0 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anna Smashnova Nathalie Tauziat
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1991 0 1 1 0.0%
15 1992 1 2 3 33.3%
16 1993 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1994 7 4 11 63.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
18 1995 3 5 8 37.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1986 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6%
19 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 12 8 20 60.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6%
20 1988 16 8 24 66.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
21 1998 3 6 9 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 17 9 26 65.4% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 1999 10 8 18 55.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1990 18 7 25 72.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 6 19 68.4%
23 2000 7 11 18 38.9% 14 7 21 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1991 14 8 22 63.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 5 15 66.7%
24 2001 2 7 9 22.2% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1992 14 8 22 63.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 8 4 12 66.7%
25 2002 28 14 42 66.7% 15 8 23 65.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 20 8 28 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 4 13 69.2%
26 2003 12 9 21 57.1% 20 7 27 74.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1994 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5%
27 2004 12 13 25 48.0% 16 7 23 69.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1995 9 9 18 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 2 11 81.8% 2 4 6 33.3%
28 2005 6 6 12 50.0% 18 7 25 72.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 11 9 20 55.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
29 2006 4 7 11 36.4% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1997 12 8 20 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 11 2 13 84.6% 11 7 18 61.1%
30 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 15 9 24 62.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 14 7 21 66.7%
31 1999 7 9 16 43.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 14 6 20 70.0%
32 2000 14 11 25 56.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 13 7 20 65.0%
33 2001 19 11 30 63.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 4 8 50.0%
Career 98 99 197 49.7% 132 81 213 62.0% 6 21 27 22.2% 6 21 27 22.2% 212 137 349 60.7% 107 75 182 58.8% 109 43 152 71.7% 120 78 198 60.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anna Smashnova Nathalie Tauziat
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1991 1492 99.4 0.0% -3.50 -0.10
15 1992 1489 98.0 +33 37.5% -1.50 1–1 1–0 +0.20
16 1993 1486 98.0 0.0% -4.50 -0.27 1984 1500 112.8 0.0% -4.50 -0.27
17 1994 1600 126.0 +9 -40 46.0% -0.46 4–4 (50%) 0–1 +0.52 1985 1540 107.2 +22 46.7% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 101.7 +0.17
18 1995 1578 118.0 +7 +20 42.9% -0.38 2–2 (50%) 1–5 (17%) 97.0 +1.76 1986 1643 133.1 -35 -75 -21 46.4% -0.09 3–8 (27%) 3–3 (50%) 98.0 -0.66
19 1996 1562 121.4 +39 -21 32.4% -1.14 3–4 (43%) 1–1 -1.26 1987 1821 143.9 -37 -85 -163 55.4% +0.15 14–5 (74%) 5–2 (71%) 112.3 -1.28
20 1988 1850 146.7 +37 -107 -227 56.3% +0.59 12–5 (71%) 6–4 (60%) 105.7 -1.09
21 1998 1583 118.4 -14 +56 50.0% -0.14 4–8 (33%) 7–0 (100%) 102.4 +0.55 1989 1876 150.1 +23 -64 -230 57.9% +0.68 10–4 (71%) 9–5 (64%) 106.8 -2.99
22 1999 1636 138.3 -5 +52 48.5% -0.03 7–8 (47%) 3–5 (38%) 99.1 +0.50 1990 1962 157.1 +20 -109 -164 63.2% +0.99 16–4 (80%) 4–8 (33%) 104.4 -0.16
23 2000 1669 125.9 -101 +130 -144 50.0% +0.02 6–2 (75%) 4–5 (44%) 103.6 +1.10 1991 1987 160.0 +41 -51 -179 61.7% +0.77 11–5 (69%) 8–8 (50%) 102.2 -2.67
24 2001 1605 116.1 -128 +190 41.3% -0.43 6–5 (55%) 4–2 (67%) 102.2 +0.41 1992 1935 154.0 +33 -15 +4 61.8% +0.83 12–6 (67%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -0.30
25 2002 1794 147.7 -18 +92 60.0% +0.67 12–7 (63%) 8–2 (80%) 109.9 +0.08 1993 1976 158.3 +42 -98 +43 62.9% +0.80 13–5 (72%) 6–6 (50%) 102.3 +0.82
26 2003 1857 141.4 +0.50 +0.98 1.045 51.1% -69 +127 -365 60.2% +0.59 11–7 (61%) 7–4 (64%) 104.0 -0.34 1994 1851 144.9 +28 -21 +122 56.9% +0.60 8–8 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 93.9 +0.62
27 2004 1710 136.5 -2.30 +0.59 0.788 43.9% -59 +259 55.7% +0.50 7–3 (70%) 4–3 (57%) 102.3 +1.59 1995 1845 146.3 -43 +7 +204 57.1% +0.38 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 98.3 -1.26
28 2005 1739 136.2 -2.91 +0.20 0.837 45.6% -103 +249 59.5% +0.79 2–4 (33%) 0–2 -0.25 1996 1800 152.0 -33 +40 +313 58.3% +0.73 6–10 (38%) 7–1 (88%) 97.2 -1.06
29 2006 1698 126.6 -3.06 -0.34 0.879 46.7% -96 +184 52.2% +0.22 5–6 (45%) +0.02 1997 1977 157.1 -43 -149 +209 60.7% +0.51 15–8 (65%) 12–7 (63%) 105.5 -0.76
30 2007 1646 92.0 +0.35 -1.43 0.805 44.6% 0.0% -4.33 -0.08 1998 2026 161.2 0 -297 +207 58.7% +0.74 16–6 (73%) 7–7 (50%) 101.5 +0.49
31 1999 1988 153.0 +7 -271 +186 58.7% +0.52 13–12 (52%) 5–7 (42%) 95.8 +0.18
32 2000 1870 151.2 +43 -148 +295 56.9% +0.40 12–10 (55%) 9–3 (75%) 99.7 +4.24
33 2001 1865 149.8 0 -190 +392 57.1% +0.37 15–10 (60%) 14–4 (78%) 105.2 +2.32
Career 1882 137.9 -2.28 +0.04 0.879 46.8% -46 +137 -242 51.8% +0.13 70–61 (53%) 40–30 (57%) 105.3 +0.96 2034 158.4 +9 -87 +99 58.5% +0.58 185–113 (62%) 111–82 (58%) 106.0 -0.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.