H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Anna Smashnova vs Tamarine Tanasugarn H2H: 3-1

Anna Smashnova holds a 3–1 lead over Tamarine Tanasugarn in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Anna Smashnova leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anna Smashnova won the 2005 Australian Open second round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anna Smashnova
ISR Age 50 Right-Handed 157 cm / 5'2"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 20, 2005* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Anna Smashnova #33 6-2 6-2 Tamarine Tanasugarn #73 Match data
Jan 12, 2002* Canberra WTA 250 F Hard Anna Smashnova #69 7-5 7-6(2) Tamarine Tanasugarn #30 Match data
Oct 19, 2000* Shanghai WTA 250 QF Hard Tamarine Tanasugarn #34 6-3 6-2 Anna Smashnova #50 Match data
May 26, 2000* Strasbourg WTA 500 R16 Clay Anna Smashnova #56 6-4 6-2 Tamarine Tanasugarn #57 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anna Smashnova #994 #15 1,616 1,882 242 221 52.3% 0 0 0 0 12 12
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,818 267 273 49.4% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anna Smashnova Tamarine Tanasugarn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1991 0–1 0.0% #264 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1992 1–2 33.3% #236 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1993 0–1 0.0% #139 1,485 0 0 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,482 0 0
17 1994 10–11 47.6% #47 1,599 0 0 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,492 0 0
18 1995 8–12 40.0% #68 1,574 0 0 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,478 0 0
19 1996 4–11 26.7% #132 1,560 0 0 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,609 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0
21 1998 12–14 46.2% #49 1,582 0 0 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0
22 1999 21–23 47.7% #47 1,637 0 1 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,634 0 0
23 2000 25–23 52.1% #46 1,668 0 2 2000 30–18 62.5% #28 1,787 0 0
24 2001 13–19 40.6% #88 1,605 0 2 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,697 0 0
25 2002 43–25 63.2% #16 1,793 0 6 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0
26 2003 37–21 63.8% #16 1,857 0 8 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1
27 2004 28–23 54.9% #32 1,732 0 9 2004 19–24 44.2% #66 1,623 0 1
28 2005 24–16 60.0% #43 1,745 0 11 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,503 0 1
29 2006 16–16 50.0% #63 1,700 0 12 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,588 0 1
30 2007 0–3 0.0% #921 1,648 0 12 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,570 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2008 19–15 55.9% #37 1,702 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,653 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,734 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,649 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,594 0 4
38 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4