H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Annabel Croft vs Akemi Nishiya H2H: 1-0
Annabel Croft holds a 1–0 lead over Akemi Nishiya in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Annabel Croft leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Annabel Croft won the 1988 Wellington third round 5-7 7-5 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 1988* | Wellington | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Annabel Croft | 5-7 7-5 7-6 | Akemi Nishiya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annabel Croft | — | — | — | 1,781 | 84 | 92 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Akemi Nishiya | — | — | — | 1,537 | 10 | 30 | 25.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Annabel Croft | Akemi Nishiya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1981 | 9–5 | 64.3% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1982 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1983 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1984 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1985 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,762 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1986 | 10–19 | 34.5% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1987 | 8–14 | 36.4% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,432 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,412 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,419 | 0 | 0 |