H2H data updated: 2026-10-23 00:00 UTC

Annabel Croft vs B Chapman H2H: 1-0

Annabel Croft holds a 1–0 lead over B Chapman in their WTA head-to-head. They have met 1 times in main draws. Most recently, Annabel Croft won the 1981 Norwich round of 32 6-0 6-1.

H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Annabel Croft 6-0 6-1 B Chapman Match data Apr 9, 1981* R32 Norwich WTA 250 —

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Annabel Croft — — — 1,780 84 92 47.7% 0 0 0 1 0 1
B Chapman — — — 1,500 0 7 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Annabel Croft B Chapman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
1981 9–5 64.3% — 1,535 0 0 1981 0–6 0.0% — 1,420 0 0
1982 14–9 60.9% — 1,588 0 0 — — — — — — —
1983 6–7 46.2% — 1,595 0 0 — — — — — — —
1984 11–14 44.0% — 1,615 0 0 — — — — — — —
1985 23–20 53.5% — 1,762 0 1 — — — — — — —
1986 10–19 34.5% — 1,653 0 1 — — — — — — —
1987 8–14 36.4% — 1,575 0 1 — — — — — — —
1988 3–3 50.0% — 1,562 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Annabel Croft B Chapman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1980 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1979 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1981 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
1982 — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1983 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1984 6 4 10 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1985 11 6 17 64.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1986 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1987 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1988 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 32 29 61 52.5% 13 19 32 40.6% 15 27 42 35.7% 11 12 23 47.8% Career — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Annabel Croft B Chapman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1980 1481 96.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.31 1979 1484 93.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.20
1981 1535 118.4 — — — — — — +47 57.7% +1.42 1–1 0–1 — +0.80 1981 1421 74.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.17 — — — -0.25
1982 1589 120.2 — — — — — +11 -33 62.5% +1.17 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — +1.92 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1983 1595 118.2 — — — — -28 — +2 50.0% -0.07 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1984 1616 118.3 — — — — -4 -7 -8 46.4% -0.14 2–4 (33%) 2–5 (29%) 96.5 +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1985 1762 133.3 — — — — +72 -225 -211 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 4–4 (50%) 105.5 +0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1986 1654 120.7 — — — — +69 -92 -160 38.2% -1.06 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.4 -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1987 1575 108.3 — — — — +47 — -107 42.3% -0.60 2–6 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 92.2 +0.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1988 1562 97.6 — — — — +29 — — 42.9% -0.50 2–0 2–2 (50%) — +0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1781 125.3 — — — — +49 -69 -71 48.1% -0.03 21–28 (43%) 15–20 (43%) 92.1 +3.64 Career 1500 81.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.15 — — — -0.71

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.