H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Annabel Croft vs Camille Bann H2H: 1-0

Annabel Croft holds a 1–0 lead over Camille Bann in their WTA head-to-head. They have met 1 times in main draws. Most recently, Annabel Croft won the 1982 Norwich round of 32 6-3 6-1.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Annabel Croft 6-3 6-1 Camille Bann Match data Apr 11, 1982* R32 Norwich WTA 250

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Annabel Croft 1,780 84 92 47.7% 0 0 0 1 0 1
Camille Bann 1,502 2 7 22.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Annabel Croft Camille Bann
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1980 0–1 0.0% 1,480 0 0 1981 1–3 25.0% 1,476 0 0
1981 9–5 64.3% 1,535 0 0 1982 1–4 20.0% 1,454 0 0
1982 14–9 60.9% 1,588 0 0
1983 6–7 46.2% 1,595 0 0
1984 11–14 44.0% 1,615 0 0
1985 23–20 53.5% 1,761 0 1
1986 10–19 34.5% 1,653 0 1
1987 8–14 36.4% 1,574 0 1
1988 3–3 50.0% 1,562 0 1

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Annabel Croft Camille Bann
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1980 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1981 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
1982 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
1983 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
1984 6 4 10 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
1985 11 6 17 64.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7%
1986 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0%
1987 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1988 3 3 6 50.0%
Career 32 29 61 52.5% 13 19 32 40.6% 15 27 42 35.7% 11 12 23 47.8% Career 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Annabel Croft Camille Bann
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1980 1481 96.7 0.0% -3.00 0–1 +0.31 1981 1477 94.8 25.0% -2.50 -0.06
1981 1535 118.4 +47 57.7% +1.42 1–1 0–1 +0.81 1982 1454 100.4 33.3% -0.89 0–1 +0.24
1982 1589 120.1 +11 -34 62.5% +1.17 0–4 (0%) 1–1 +2.10
1983 1595 118.1 -29 +1 50.0% -0.07 1–3 (25%) 1–1 +0.87
1984 1615 118.2 -3 -7 -8 46.4% -0.14 2–4 (33%) 2–5 (29%) 96.5 +0.33
1985 1762 133.2 +72 -225 -211 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 4–4 (50%) 105.5 +0.98
1986 1653 120.6 +70 -91 -160 38.2% -1.06 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.5 -0.89
1987 1575 108.2 +47 -109 42.3% -0.60 2–6 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 92.2 +0.97
1988 1562 97.6 +29 42.9% -0.50 2–0 2–2 (50%) +0.72
Career 1780 125.1 +50 -68 -71 48.1% -0.03 21–28 (43%) 15–20 (43%) 92.1 +3.54 Career 1503 97.6 29.4% -1.65 0–1 +2.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.