H2H data updated: 2026-10-19 00:00 UTC

Annabel Croft vs E May H2H: 1-0

Annabel Croft holds a 1–0 lead over E May in their WTA head-to-head. They have met 1 times in main draws. Most recently, Annabel Croft won the 1981 Ilkley 1 round of 32 6-0 6-1.

H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Annabel Croft 6-0 6-1 E May Match data Mar 2, 1981* R32 Ilkley 1 WTA 250 —

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Annabel Croft — — — 1,780 84 92 47.7% 0 0 0 1 0 1
E May — — — 1,500 0 2 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Annabel Croft E May
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,468 0 0
1981 9–5 64.3% — 1,535 0 0 — — — — — — —
1982 14–9 60.9% — 1,588 0 0 — — — — — — —
1983 6–7 46.2% — 1,595 0 0 — — — — — — —
1984 11–14 44.0% — 1,615 0 0 — — — — — — —
1985 23–20 53.5% — 1,762 0 1 — — — — — — —
1986 10–19 34.5% — 1,653 0 1 — — — — — — —
1987 8–14 36.4% — 1,575 0 1 — — — — — — —
1988 3–3 50.0% — 1,562 0 1 — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Annabel Croft E May
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1980 1481 96.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.31 1981 1469 90.6 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.20 0–1 — — +0.03
1981 1535 118.4 — — — — — — +47 57.7% +1.42 1–1 0–1 — +0.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1982 1589 120.2 — — — — — +11 -33 62.5% +1.17 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — +1.92 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1983 1595 118.2 — — — — -28 — +2 50.0% -0.07 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1984 1616 118.3 — — — — -4 -7 -8 46.4% -0.14 2–4 (33%) 2–5 (29%) 96.5 +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1985 1762 133.3 — — — — +72 -225 -211 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 4–4 (50%) 105.5 +0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1986 1654 120.7 — — — — +69 -92 -160 38.2% -1.06 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.4 -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1987 1575 108.3 — — — — +47 — -107 42.3% -0.60 2–6 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 92.2 +0.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1988 1562 97.6 — — — — +29 — — 42.9% -0.50 2–0 2–2 (50%) — +0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1781 125.3 — — — — +49 -69 -71 48.1% -0.03 21–28 (43%) 15–20 (43%) 92.1 +3.64 Career 1500 94.8 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.20 0–1 — — +1.50

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.