H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Annabel Croft vs Hu Na H2H: 0-1
Hu Na holds a 1–0 lead over Annabel Croft in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hu Na leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Hu Na won the 1985 Wimbledon first round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 1985* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Hu Na | 6-3 7-5 | Annabel Croft | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annabel Croft | — | — | — | 1,781 | 84 | 92 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Hu Na | — | — | — | 1,701 | 60 | 94 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Annabel Croft | Hu Na | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1981 | 9–5 | 64.3% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1982 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1983 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1984 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,762 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 10–19 | 34.5% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1987 | 8–14 | 36.4% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 11–16 | 40.7% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |