Annabel Croft
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liz Smylie | 2 | 3 | 5 | Jun 26, 1987 | H2H |
| Katerina Maleeva | 2 | 3 | 5 | Feb 24, 1987 | H2H |
| Gabriela Sabatini | 0 | 4 | 4 | Feb 19, 1987 | H2H |
| Terry Phelps | 2 | 1 | 3 | Feb 5, 1988 | H2H |
| Pam Casale | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jun 17, 1987 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC
Annabel Croft vs Hu Na H2H: 0-1
Hu Na holds a 1–0 lead over Annabel Croft in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hu Na leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Hu Na won the 1985 Wimbledon round of 128 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hu Na | 6-3 7-5 | Annabel Croft | Match data | Jun 26, 1985* | R128 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annabel Croft | — | — | — | 1,780 | 84 | 92 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Hu Na | — | — | — | 1,702 | 60 | 94 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Annabel Croft | Hu Na | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1981 | 9–5 | 64.3% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1982 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1983 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1984 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 10–19 | 34.5% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1987 | 8–14 | 36.4% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 11–16 | 40.7% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Annabel Croft | Hu Na | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 13 | 1980 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1981 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1982 | — | — | — | — | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1983 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1984 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1985 | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 1981 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1986 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1987 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1983 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1988 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 32 | 29 | 61 | 52.5% | 13 | 19 | 32 | 40.6% | 15 | 27 | 42 | 35.7% | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | — | 29 | 46 | 75 | 38.7% | 7 | 14 | 21 | 33.3% | 16 | 22 | 38 | 42.1% | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Annabel Croft | Hu Na | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 13 | 1980 | 1481 | 96.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1981 | 1535 | 118.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +47 | 57.7% | +1.42 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.81 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1982 | 1589 | 120.1 | — | — | — | — | — | +11 | -34 | 62.5% | +1.17 | 0–4 (0%) | 1–1 | — | +2.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1983 | 1595 | 118.1 | — | — | — | — | -29 | — | +1 | 50.0% | -0.07 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–1 | — | +0.87 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1984 | 1615 | 118.2 | — | — | — | — | -3 | -7 | -8 | 46.4% | -0.14 | 2–4 (33%) | 2–5 (29%) | 96.5 | +0.33 | 1980 | 1505 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.30 | — | 2–0 | — | -0.20 |
| 18 | 1985 | 1762 | 133.2 | — | — | — | — | +72 | -225 | -211 | 50.5% | +0.20 | 9–4 (69%) | 4–4 (50%) | 105.5 | +0.98 | 1981 | 1497 | 94.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.01 |
| 19 | 1986 | 1653 | 120.6 | — | — | — | — | +70 | -91 | -160 | 38.2% | -1.06 | 4–6 (40%) | 3–1 (75%) | 99.5 | -0.89 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1987 | 1575 | 108.2 | — | — | — | — | +47 | — | -109 | 42.3% | -0.60 | 2–6 (25%) | 2–4 (33%) | 92.2 | +0.97 | 1983 | 1482 | 102.7 | — | — | — | — | +55 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.13 | — | — | — | +0.33 |
| 21 | 1988 | 1562 | 97.6 | — | — | — | — | +29 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.50 | 2–0 | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.72 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1537 | 120.9 | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | +34 | 43.8% | -0.75 | 0–2 | 0–2 | — | +0.41 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1575 | 112.6 | — | — | — | — | +7 | -17 | -5 | 42.2% | -0.55 | 5–5 (50%) | 6–2 (75%) | 104.9 | +2.38 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1654 | 129.6 | — | — | — | — | -11 | -85 | -57 | 49.4% | +0.18 | 6–7 (46%) | 2–6 (25%) | 98.9 | +0.05 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1584 | 122.3 | — | — | — | — | +26 | -52 | -39 | 36.7% | -0.90 | 2–6 (25%) | 3–3 (50%) | 96.3 | -0.71 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1578 | 119.6 | — | — | — | — | -34 | -61 | +49 | 39.6% | -0.33 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–4 (20%) | 98.3 | +0.32 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1561 | 108.7 | — | — | — | — | -57 | -60 | +88 | 41.9% | -0.47 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–2 (50%) | 96.9 | +0.79 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1542 | 98.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | +0.17 |
| Career | — | 1780 | 125.1 | — | — | — | — | +50 | -68 | -71 | 48.1% | -0.03 | 21–28 (43%) | 15–20 (43%) | 92.1 | +3.54 | — | 1702 | 122.7 | — | — | — | — | -1 | -57 | +13 | 41.8% | -0.47 | 17–27 (39%) | 16–19 (46%) | 96.9 | +2.29 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Hu Na
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Pfaff | 2 | 3 | 5 | Nov 6, 1987 | H2H |
| Camille Benjamin | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jun 13, 1990 | H2H |
| Zina Garrison | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 15, 1989 | H2H |
| Rosalyn Fairbank | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 22, 1989 | H2H |
| Leila Meskhi | 2 | 1 | 3 | Apr 12, 1989 | H2H |