H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Annabel Croft vs Jill Hetherington H2H: 0-1
Jill Hetherington holds a 1–0 lead over Annabel Croft in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jill Hetherington leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jill Hetherington won the 1984 Montreal third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 60
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 61
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 1984* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Jill Hetherington | 6-2 6-1 | Annabel Croft | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annabel Croft | — | — | — | 1,781 | 84 | 92 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Jill Hetherington | #748 | #64 | 12 | 1,645 | 30 | 57 | 34.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Annabel Croft | Jill Hetherington | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1981 | 9–5 | 64.3% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1982 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1983 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1984 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1985 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,762 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 10–19 | 34.5% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 8–14 | 36.4% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #118 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #386 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #169 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #81 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #122 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #247 | 1,479 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,473 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #277 | 1,456 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #468 | 1,436 | 0 | 1 |