H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Annabel Croft vs Jill Hetherington H2H: 0-1

Jill Hetherington holds a 1–0 lead over Annabel Croft in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jill Hetherington leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jill Hetherington won the 1984 Canadian Open round of 32 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Annabel Croft
GBR Age 60
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Jill Hetherington
CAN Age 61 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jill Hetherington #259 6-2 6-1 Annabel Croft Match data Aug 23, 1984* R32 Canadian Open Category 4 → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Annabel Croft — — — 1,780 84 92 47.7% 0 0 0 1 0 1
Jill Hetherington #748 #64 12 1,645 31 58 34.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Annabel Croft Jill Hetherington
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
14 1981 9–5 64.3% — 1,535 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1982 14–9 60.9% — 1,588 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1983 6–7 46.2% — 1,595 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1984 11–14 44.0% — 1,615 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1985 23–20 53.5% — 1,761 0 1 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,507 0 0
19 1986 10–19 34.5% — 1,653 0 1 1984 2–2 50.0% #121 1,543 0 0
20 1987 8–14 36.4% — 1,574 0 1 1985 0–2 0.0% #118 1,522 0 0
21 1988 3–3 50.0% — 1,562 0 1 1986 1–1 50.0% #386 1,536 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1987 2–4 33.3% #169 1,534 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 1988 15–19 44.1% #81 1,573 0 1
24 — — — — — — — 1989 8–17 32.0% #122 1,532 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 1990 1–6 14.3% #247 1,482 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 1991 0–1 0.0% #245 1,475 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 1992 1–3 25.0% #277 1,458 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 1993 0–2 0.0% #468 1,437 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Annabel Croft Jill Hetherington
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1980 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1982 — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1985 11 6 17 64.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 1983 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1986 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1984 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1987 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1988 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 13 13 26 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 6 14 20 30.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 32 29 61 52.5% 13 19 32 40.6% 15 27 42 35.7% 11 12 23 47.8% — 24 42 66 36.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 10 15 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Annabel Croft Jill Hetherington
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1980 1481 96.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1981 1535 118.4 — — — — — — +47 57.7% +1.42 1–1 0–1 — +0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1982 1589 120.1 — — — — — +11 -34 62.5% +1.17 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — +2.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1983 1595 118.1 — — — — -29 — +1 50.0% -0.07 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.87 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1984 1615 118.2 — — — — -3 -7 -8 46.4% -0.14 2–4 (33%) 2–5 (29%) 96.5 +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1985 1762 133.2 — — — — +72 -225 -211 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 4–4 (50%) 105.5 +0.98 1983 1507 98.2 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.67 1–1 — — +0.39
19 1986 1653 120.6 — — — — +70 -91 -160 38.2% -1.06 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.5 -0.89 1984 1543 109.8 — — — — +46 — — 54.5% +0.64 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.28
20 1987 1575 108.2 — — — — +47 — -109 42.3% -0.60 2–6 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 92.2 +0.97 1985 1523 106.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.21
21 1988 1562 97.6 — — — — +29 — — 42.9% -0.50 2–0 2–2 (50%) — +0.72 1986 1537 105.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.25 — 1–0 — +0.01
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1534 111.8 — — — — — +29 — 33.3% -0.17 2–0 0–3 (0%) — +0.14
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1573 119.5 — — — — +34 — -38 46.9% -0.23 5–8 (38%) 4–4 (50%) 98.9 +1.57
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1532 113.9 — — — — -43 — +52 36.8% -0.89 2–5 (29%) 3–3 (50%) 97.3 +0.78
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1482 97.6 — — — — -40 — — 25.0% -1.63 0–2 — — +0.39
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1476 101.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 0–1 — -0.05
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1459 96.2 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.10 0–2 — — +0.64
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1438 95.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — 0.00
Career — 1780 125.1 — — — — +50 -68 -71 48.1% -0.03 21–28 (43%) 15–20 (43%) 92.1 +3.54 — 1645 115.3 — — — — -1 +29 -5 40.2% -0.64 11–22 (33%) 9–14 (39%) 91.7 +3.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.