H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Annabel Croft vs Kate Brasher H2H: 0-3

Kate Brasher holds a 3–0 lead over Annabel Croft in their WTA head-to-head. They have met 3 times in main draws. Most recently, Kate Brasher won the 1982 West Worthing quarterfinal 2-6 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Annabel Croft
GBR Age 60
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
Kate Brasher
GBR Age 64

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kate Brasher 2-6 6-3 6-2 Annabel Croft Match data Apr 24, 1982* QF West Worthing WTA 250 —
Kate Brasher 6-4 7-6 Annabel Croft Match data Apr 17, 1981* R16 Hampstead WTA 250 —
Kate Brasher 6-3 6-4 Annabel Croft Match data Mar 4, 1981* SF Ilkley 1 WTA 250 —

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Annabel Croft — — — 1,780 84 92 47.7% 0 0 0 1 0 1
Kate Brasher — — — 1,734 73 61 54.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Annabel Croft Kate Brasher
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 1976 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
14 1981 9–5 64.3% — 1,535 0 0 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,465 0 0
15 1982 14–9 60.9% — 1,588 0 0 1978 7–7 50.0% — 1,493 0 0
16 1983 6–7 46.2% — 1,595 0 0 1979 0–4 0.0% — 1,440 0 0
17 1984 11–14 44.0% — 1,615 0 0 1980 8–11 42.1% — 1,481 0 0
18 1985 23–20 53.5% — 1,761 0 1 1981 29–16 64.4% — 1,622 0 2
19 1986 10–19 34.5% — 1,653 0 1 1982 25–11 69.4% — 1,638 0 4
20 1987 8–14 36.4% — 1,574 0 1 1983 3–5 37.5% — 1,612 0 6
21 1988 3–3 50.0% — 1,562 0 1 1984 1–2 33.3% — 1,584 0 6
22 — — — — — — — 1985 0–3 0.0% — 1,530 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Annabel Croft Kate Brasher
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1980 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1976 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
14 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
15 1982 — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1978 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1979 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1980 — — — — 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
18 1985 11 6 17 64.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1986 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
20 1987 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
21 1988 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 32 29 61 52.5% 13 19 32 40.6% 15 27 42 35.7% 11 12 23 47.8% — 2 4 6 33.3% 17 18 35 48.6% 5 17 22 22.7% 0 3 3 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Annabel Croft Kate Brasher
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1980 1481 96.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.31 1976 1481 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.46
14 1981 1535 118.4 — — — — — — +47 57.7% +1.42 1–1 0–1 — +0.81 1977 1466 99.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 1–1 — +0.25
15 1982 1589 120.1 — — — — — +11 -34 62.5% +1.17 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — +2.10 1978 1493 109.5 — — — — — — +17 50.0% +0.37 1–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.65
16 1983 1595 118.1 — — — — -29 — +1 50.0% -0.07 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.87 1979 1440 92.3 — — — — — +18 — 0.0% -3.17 — — — +0.70
17 1984 1615 118.2 — — — — -3 -7 -8 46.4% -0.14 2–4 (33%) 2–5 (29%) 96.5 +0.33 1980 1481 106.8 — — — — — -8 +24 42.2% -0.47 4–3 (57%) — — +0.76
18 1985 1762 133.2 — — — — +72 -225 -211 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 4–4 (50%) 105.5 +0.98 1981 1622 128.1 — — — — — — -127 63.4% +0.97 2–5 (29%) 4–3 (57%) 97.1 +0.48
19 1986 1653 120.6 — — — — +70 -91 -160 38.2% -1.06 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.5 -0.89 1982 1638 118.0 — — — — -125 -5 -130 64.1% +1.04 6–2 (75%) 2–2 (50%) 105.1 +2.77
20 1987 1575 108.2 — — — — +47 — -109 42.3% -0.60 2–6 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 92.2 +0.97 1983 1612 104.4 — — — — — — -134 35.0% -1.20 3–1 (75%) 0–3 (0%) 100.1 +0.33
21 1988 1562 97.6 — — — — +29 — — 42.9% -0.50 2–0 2–2 (50%) — +0.72 1984 1585 95.2 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.43 1–0 — — +0.64
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1531 92.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — +0.31
Career — 1780 125.1 — — — — +50 -68 -71 48.1% -0.03 21–28 (43%) 15–20 (43%) 92.1 +3.54 — 1735 116.9 — — — — -125 -4 -78 52.8% +0.29 17–13 (57%) 9–11 (45%) 102.6 +5.61

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.