H2H data updated: 2026-10-17 00:00 UTC

Annabel Croft vs Laura Arraya H2H: 0-1

Laura Arraya holds a 1–0 lead over Annabel Croft in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laura Arraya leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Laura Arraya won the 1984 Roland Garros round of 128 6-4 4-6 9-7.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Annabel Croft
GBR Age 60
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Laura Arraya
PER Age 62 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Laura Arraya #23 6-4 4-6 9-7 Annabel Croft Match data May 30, 1984* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Annabel Croft — — — 1,780 84 92 47.7% 0 0 0 1 0 1
Laura Arraya #192 #14 51 1,922 270 204 57.0% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Annabel Croft Laura Arraya
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
14 1981 9–5 64.3% — 1,535 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1982 14–9 60.9% — 1,588 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1983 6–7 46.2% — 1,595 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1984 11–14 44.0% — 1,615 0 0 1981 19–8 70.4% — 1,685 0 4
18 1985 23–20 53.5% — 1,762 0 1 1982 33–17 66.0% — 1,741 0 7
19 1986 10–19 34.5% — 1,653 0 1 1983 23–23 50.0% — 1,713 0 7
20 1987 8–14 36.4% — 1,575 0 1 1984 29–18 61.7% #34 1,760 0 8
21 1988 3–3 50.0% — 1,562 0 1 1985 17–21 44.7% #63 1,691 0 8
22 — — — — — — — 1986 23–24 48.9% #33 1,718 0 8
23 — — — — — — — 1987 16–14 53.3% #45 1,770 0 8
25 — — — — — — — 1989 27–12 69.2% #19 1,882 0 10
26 — — — — — — — 1990 26–19 57.8% #21 1,821 0 10
27 — — — — — — — 1991 28–17 62.2% #24 1,823 0 10
28 — — — — — — — 1992 20–19 51.3% #45 1,732 0 10
29 — — — — — — — 1993 9–12 42.9% #71 1,682 0 10

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Annabel Croft Laura Arraya
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1980 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1982 — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1985 11 6 17 64.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 1982 10 6 16 62.5% 23 10 33 69.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1986 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1983 10 8 18 55.6% 10 11 21 47.6% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
20 1987 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 7 7 14 50.0% 19 7 26 73.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1988 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 9 9 18 50.0% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 3 7 10 30.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 7 5 12 58.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 15 3 18 83.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 13 6 19 68.4% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 18 12 30 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 8 9 17 47.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 4 6 10 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
Career — 32 29 61 52.5% 13 19 32 40.6% 15 27 42 35.7% 11 12 23 47.8% — 105 80 185 56.8% 103 73 176 58.5% 16 14 30 53.3% 28 31 59 47.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Annabel Croft Laura Arraya
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1980 1481 96.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1981 1535 118.4 — — — — — — +47 57.7% +1.42 1–1 0–1 — +0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1982 1589 120.2 — — — — — +11 -33 62.5% +1.17 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — +2.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1983 1595 118.2 — — — — -28 — +2 50.0% -0.07 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1984 1616 118.3 — — — — -4 -7 -8 46.4% -0.14 2–4 (33%) 2–5 (29%) 96.5 +0.33 1981 1686 129.2 — — — — -72 — — 65.6% +0.74 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 104.4 -1.24
18 1985 1762 133.3 — — — — +72 -225 -211 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 4–4 (50%) 105.5 +0.81 1982 1742 127.0 — — — — -62 -26 — 62.7% +0.91 10–8 (56%) 8–5 (62%) 102.3 +2.77
19 1986 1654 120.7 — — — — +69 -92 -160 38.2% -1.06 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.4 -0.97 1983 1713 125.8 — — — — +7 +31 — 51.4% -0.24 8–11 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 95.2 +0.81
20 1987 1575 108.3 — — — — +47 — -107 42.3% -0.60 2–6 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 92.2 +0.96 1984 1760 130.7 — — — — -102 +142 -131 53.8% +0.03 18–5 (78%) 9–4 (69%) 110.1 +0.93
21 1988 1562 97.6 — — — — +29 — — 42.9% -0.50 2–0 2–2 (50%) — +0.72 1985 1692 125.0 — — — — -1 +60 — 45.1% -0.27 8–7 (53%) 3–2 (60%) 99.8 +1.85
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1719 138.2 — — — — -26 +99 — 51.0% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 100.4 -1.93
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1771 133.6 — — — — -31 -12 -185 51.6% +0.05 3–1 (75%) 0–3 (0%) 100.0 -2.61
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1883 136.9 — — — — -7 -146 -254 65.2% +0.79 7–4 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 102.9 +0.24
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1821 142.0 — — — — +31 -55 -173 55.4% +0.46 7–4 (64%) 5–8 (38%) 98.6 +0.41
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1824 132.7 — — — — +12 -70 -95 56.9% +0.19 10–4 (71%) 5–4 (56%) 105.5 +2.96
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1733 139.0 — — — — +2 +53 +3 49.4% +0.06 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) 97.6 +1.62
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1682 125.0 — — — — +13 +124 +9 44.0% -0.66 4–4 (50%) 2–0 — -0.06
Career — 1781 125.3 — — — — +49 -69 -71 48.1% -0.03 21–28 (43%) 15–20 (43%) 92.1 +3.41 — 1923 138.4 — — — — -10 +27 -133 54.6% +0.19 90–63 (59%) 50–44 (53%) 104.5 +1.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.