H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Annabel Croft vs Leigh Anne Thompson H2H: 2-0
Annabel Croft holds a 2–0 lead over Leigh Anne Thompson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Annabel Croft leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Annabel Croft won the 1985 Australian Indoor fourth round 6-1 3-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 1985* | Australian Indoor | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Annabel Croft | 6-1 3-6 7-6 | Leigh Anne Thompson | Match data |
| Apr 25, 1985* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Annabel Croft | 4-6 6-2 6-4 | Leigh Anne Thompson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annabel Croft | — | — | — | 1,781 | 84 | 92 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Leigh Anne Thompson | — | — | — | 1,793 | 42 | 73 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Annabel Croft | Leigh Anne Thompson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1981 | 9–5 | 64.3% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1982 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1983 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1984 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,762 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 20–23 | 46.5% | — | 1,766 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1986 | 10–19 | 34.5% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 7–17 | 29.2% | — | 1,705 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1987 | 8–14 | 36.4% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 0–8 | 0.0% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1988 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 1 |