H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Annabel Croft vs Leigh Anne Thompson H2H: 2-0

Annabel Croft holds a 2–0 lead over Leigh Anne Thompson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Annabel Croft leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Annabel Croft won the 1985 Australian Indoor round of 16 6-1 3-6 7-6.

H2H
2 0
2 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Annabel Croft 6-1 3-6 7-6 Leigh Anne Thompson Match data May 10, 1985* R16 Australian Indoor WTA 250 Hard
Annabel Croft 4-6 6-2 6-4 Leigh Anne Thompson Match data Apr 25, 1985* R32 San Diego WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Annabel Croft 1,780 84 92 47.7% 0 0 0 1 0 1
Leigh Anne Thompson 1,792 42 73 36.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Annabel Croft Leigh Anne Thompson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1980 0–1 0.0% 1,480 0 0
14 1981 9–5 64.3% 1,535 0 0
15 1982 14–9 60.9% 1,588 0 0
16 1983 6–7 46.2% 1,595 0 0
17 1984 11–14 44.0% 1,615 0 0 1981 4–5 44.4% 1,542 0 0
18 1985 23–20 53.5% 1,761 0 1 1982 20–23 46.5% 1,765 0 1
19 1986 10–19 34.5% 1,653 0 1 1983 7–17 29.2% 1,715 0 1
20 1987 8–14 36.4% 1,574 0 1 1984 0–8 0.0% 1,589 0 1
21 1988 3–3 50.0% 1,562 0 1 1985 6–11 35.3% 1,594 0 1
22 1986 5–9 35.7% 1,555 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Annabel Croft Leigh Anne Thompson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1980 0 1 1 0.0%
14 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
15 1982 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
16 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1981 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1985 11 6 17 64.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 1982 7 2 9 77.8% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 6 9 15 40.0%
19 1986 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1983 1 4 5 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 8 12 33.3%
20 1987 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 0 5 5 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1988 3 3 6 50.0% 1985 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1986 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
Career 32 29 61 52.5% 13 19 32 40.6% 15 27 42 35.7% 11 12 23 47.8% 16 25 41 39.0% 13 20 33 39.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 13 22 35 37.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Annabel Croft Leigh Anne Thompson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1980 1481 96.7 0.0% -3.00 0–1 +0.31
14 1981 1535 118.4 +47 57.7% +1.42 1–1 0–1 +0.81
15 1982 1589 120.1 +11 -34 62.5% +1.17 0–4 (0%) 1–1 +2.10
16 1983 1595 118.1 -29 +1 50.0% -0.07 1–3 (25%) 1–1 +0.87
17 1984 1615 118.2 -3 -7 -8 46.4% -0.14 2–4 (33%) 2–5 (29%) 96.5 +0.33 1981 1543 110.4 +61 +27 47.6% 0.00 1–2 (33%) 1–1 +0.41
18 1985 1762 133.2 +72 -225 -211 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 4–4 (50%) 105.5 +0.98 1982 1765 135.1 +1 -160 -227 45.7% -0.04 5–5 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 100.7 -0.61
19 1986 1653 120.6 +70 -91 -160 38.2% -1.06 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.5 -0.89 1983 1715 134.4 +4 -84 38.8% -0.96 0–5 (0%) 1–1 -2.18
20 1987 1575 108.2 +47 -109 42.3% -0.60 2–6 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 92.2 +0.97 1984 1590 92.8 +12 -27 11.1% -2.33 0–2 1–2 (33%) -0.15
21 1988 1562 97.6 +29 42.9% -0.50 2–0 2–2 (50%) +0.72 1985 1594 115.3 +21 36.8% -0.66 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) +0.16
22 1986 1556 101.1 -8 -18 43.8% -0.53 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 95.1 +1.93
Career 1780 125.1 +50 -68 -71 48.1% -0.03 21–28 (43%) 15–20 (43%) 92.1 +3.54 1793 126.6 +9 -96 -227 40.5% -0.53 10–22 (31%) 9–13 (41%) 89.9 -0.39

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.