Annabel Croft
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liz Smylie | 2 | 3 | 5 | Jun 26, 1987 | H2H |
| Katerina Maleeva | 2 | 3 | 5 | Feb 24, 1987 | H2H |
| Gabriela Sabatini | 0 | 4 | 4 | Feb 19, 1987 | H2H |
| Terry Phelps | 2 | 1 | 3 | Feb 5, 1988 | H2H |
| Pam Casale | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jun 17, 1987 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC
Annabel Croft and Melissa Gurney are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Melissa Gurney leads 1–0 on carpet, while Annabel Croft leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Melissa Gurney won the 1986 Tokyo Pan Pacific round of 32 6-1 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melissa Gurney | 6-1 4-6 6-3 | Annabel Croft | Match data | Sep 11, 1986* | R32 | Tokyo Pan Pacific | WTA 250 | Carpet |
| Annabel Croft | 5-7 6-2 6-3 | Melissa Gurney | Match data | Apr 27, 1985* | SF | San Diego | WTA 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annabel Croft | — | — | — | 1,780 | 84 | 92 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Melissa Gurney | #1,006 | #17 | 33 | 1,884 | 63 | 61 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Annabel Croft | Melissa Gurney | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1981 | 9–5 | 64.3% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1982 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1983 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1984 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #23 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1985 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #92 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1986 | 10–19 | 34.5% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #97 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1987 | 8–14 | 36.4% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,561 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1988 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Annabel Croft | Melissa Gurney | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 13 | 1980 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1981 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1982 | — | — | — | — | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 16 | 1983 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1985 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 17 | 1984 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 20 | 7 | 27 | 74.1% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% |
| 18 | 1985 | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 1987 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 19 | 1986 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1988 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1987 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1989 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1988 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 32 | 29 | 61 | 52.5% | 13 | 19 | 32 | 40.6% | 15 | 27 | 42 | 35.7% | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | — | 44 | 33 | 77 | 57.1% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Annabel Croft | Melissa Gurney | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 13 | 1980 | 1481 | 96.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1981 | 1535 | 118.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +47 | 57.7% | +1.42 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.81 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1982 | 1589 | 120.1 | — | — | — | — | — | +11 | -34 | 62.5% | +1.17 | 0–4 (0%) | 1–1 | — | +2.10 | 1984 | 1561 | 123.0 | — | — | — | — | +69 | — | — | 50.0% | +0.41 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.59 |
| 16 | 1983 | 1595 | 118.1 | — | — | — | — | -29 | — | +1 | 50.0% | -0.07 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–1 | — | +0.87 | 1985 | 1629 | 129.4 | — | — | — | — | +38 | — | -65 | 48.9% | -0.04 | 0–5 (0%) | 0–1 | — | +0.14 |
| 17 | 1984 | 1615 | 118.2 | — | — | — | — | -3 | -7 | -8 | 46.4% | -0.14 | 2–4 (33%) | 2–5 (29%) | 96.5 | +0.33 | 1986 | 1866 | 150.1 | — | — | — | — | +7 | -270 | -266 | 64.8% | +1.29 | 5–6 (45%) | 5–3 (63%) | 101.5 | +0.40 |
| 18 | 1985 | 1762 | 133.2 | — | — | — | — | +72 | -225 | -211 | 50.5% | +0.20 | 9–4 (69%) | 4–4 (50%) | 105.5 | +0.98 | 1987 | 1660 | 107.0 | — | — | — | — | +22 | — | — | 43.4% | -0.53 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–3 (25%) | 96.3 | +2.75 |
| 19 | 1986 | 1653 | 120.6 | — | — | — | — | +70 | -91 | -160 | 38.2% | -1.06 | 4–6 (40%) | 3–1 (75%) | 99.5 | -0.89 | 1988 | 1581 | 108.1 | — | — | — | — | +23 | -38 | — | 40.8% | -0.84 | 2–5 (29%) | 0–2 | — | +0.93 |
| 20 | 1987 | 1575 | 108.2 | — | — | — | — | +47 | — | -109 | 42.3% | -0.60 | 2–6 (25%) | 2–4 (33%) | 92.2 | +0.97 | 1989 | 1562 | 96.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.18 |
| 21 | 1988 | 1562 | 97.6 | — | — | — | — | +29 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.50 | 2–0 | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.72 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1780 | 125.1 | — | — | — | — | +50 | -68 | -71 | 48.1% | -0.03 | 21–28 (43%) | 15–20 (43%) | 92.1 | +3.54 | — | 1884 | 133.3 | — | — | — | — | +24 | -137 | -180 | 52.2% | +0.24 | 10–20 (33%) | 6–9 (40%) | 91.7 | +4.02 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liz Smylie | 2 | 3 | 5 | Jun 26, 1987 | H2H |
| Katerina Maleeva | 2 | 3 | 5 | Feb 24, 1987 | H2H |
| Gabriela Sabatini | 0 | 4 | 4 | Feb 19, 1987 | H2H |
| Terry Phelps | 2 | 1 | 3 | Feb 5, 1988 | H2H |
| Pam Casale | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jun 17, 1987 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helena Sukova | 0 | 5 | 5 | Sep 3, 1987 | H2H |
| Catherine Tanvier | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 24, 1988 | H2H |
| Elly Hakami | 0 | 3 | 3 | Apr 22, 1988 | H2H |
| Lea Antonoplis | 3 | 0 | 3 | Apr 18, 1987 | H2H |
| Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 0 | 3 | 3 | Nov 17, 1986 | H2H |