H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Annabel Croft vs Neige Dias H2H: 0-2
Neige Dias holds a 2–0 lead over Annabel Croft in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Neige Dias leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Neige Dias won the 1986 Wimbledon first round 1-6 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 1986* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Neige Dias | 1-6 6-2 6-4 | Annabel Croft | Match data |
| Jun 11, 1986* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Neige Dias | 7-5 6-2 | Annabel Croft | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annabel Croft | — | — | — | 1,781 | 84 | 92 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Neige Dias | — | — | — | 1,748 | 75 | 75 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Annabel Croft | Neige Dias | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1981 | 9–5 | 64.3% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1982 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1983 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1984 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,762 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 10–19 | 34.5% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 19–19 | 50.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 8–14 | 36.4% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1988 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 25–13 | 65.8% | — | 1,712 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 9–10 | 47.4% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 2 |