H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Annabel Croft vs Neige Dias H2H: 0-2

Neige Dias holds a 2–0 lead over Annabel Croft in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Neige Dias leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Neige Dias won the 1986 Wimbledon round of 128 1-6 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Annabel Croft
GBR Age 60
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Neige Dias
BRA Age 59

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Neige Dias 1-6 6-2 6-4 Annabel Croft Match data Jun 25, 1986* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Neige Dias 7-5 6-2 Annabel Croft Match data Jun 11, 1986* R64 Birmingham WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Annabel Croft — — — 1,780 84 92 47.7% 0 0 0 1 0 1
Neige Dias — — — 1,748 75 75 50.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Annabel Croft Neige Dias
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
14 1981 9–5 64.3% — 1,535 0 0 1981 2–3 40.0% — 1,493 0 0
15 1982 14–9 60.9% — 1,588 0 0 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,497 0 0
16 1983 6–7 46.2% — 1,595 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1984 11–14 44.0% — 1,615 0 0 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0
18 1985 23–20 53.5% — 1,761 0 1 1985 6–12 33.3% — 1,527 0 0
19 1986 10–19 34.5% — 1,653 0 1 1986 19–19 50.0% — 1,610 0 0
20 1987 8–14 36.4% — 1,574 0 1 1987 12–15 44.4% — 1,647 0 1
21 1988 3–3 50.0% — 1,562 0 1 1988 25–13 65.8% — 1,712 0 2
22 — — — — — — — 1989 9–10 47.4% — 1,673 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Annabel Croft Neige Dias
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1980 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1982 — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1982 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1984 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1985 11 6 17 64.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 1986 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1986 6 7 13 46.2% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
20 1987 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 5 8 13 38.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1988 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 7 6 13 53.8% 18 7 25 72.0% — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — — — —
Career — 32 29 61 52.5% 13 19 32 40.6% 15 27 42 35.7% 11 12 23 47.8% — 19 27 46 41.3% 47 35 82 57.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Annabel Croft Neige Dias
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1980 1481 96.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1981 1535 118.4 — — — — — — +47 57.7% +1.42 1–1 0–1 — +0.81 1981 1493 96.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.17 2–0 1–0 — -0.12
15 1982 1589 120.1 — — — — — +11 -34 62.5% +1.17 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — +2.10 1982 1497 97.5 — — — — — +31 — 50.0% -0.63 — — — +0.58
16 1983 1595 118.1 — — — — -29 — +1 50.0% -0.07 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.87 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1984 1615 118.2 — — — — -3 -7 -8 46.4% -0.14 2–4 (33%) 2–5 (29%) 96.5 +0.33 1984 1482 98.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.16
18 1985 1762 133.2 — — — — +72 -225 -211 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 4–4 (50%) 105.5 +0.98 1985 1528 114.5 — — — — +21 +57 — 28.9% -1.66 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 -0.55
19 1986 1653 120.6 — — — — +70 -91 -160 38.2% -1.06 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.5 -0.89 1986 1611 116.1 — — — — +2 -17 -16 50.6% -0.05 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 100.1 +4.40
20 1987 1575 108.2 — — — — +47 — -109 42.3% -0.60 2–6 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 92.2 +0.97 1987 1648 123.5 — — — — -61 +20 — 46.8% -0.05 3–5 (38%) 2–3 (40%) 97.3 +1.34
21 1988 1562 97.6 — — — — +29 — — 42.9% -0.50 2–0 2–2 (50%) — +0.72 1988 1712 129.5 — — — — -100 +84 — 62.1% +0.79 7–4 (64%) 5–0 (100%) 107.2 +2.97
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1674 112.9 — — — — — +55 — 47.8% -0.46 4–4 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 101.3 +0.66
Career — 1780 125.1 — — — — +50 -68 -71 48.1% -0.03 21–28 (43%) 15–20 (43%) 92.1 +3.54 — 1749 122.0 — — — — -40 +47 -16 49.3% -0.13 24–21 (53%) 19–7 (73%) 109.2 +6.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.