H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Annabel Croft vs Nicole Jagerman H2H: 1-1

Annabel Croft and Nicole Jagerman are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nicole Jagerman leads 1–0 on carpet, while Annabel Croft leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Annabel Croft won the 1987 Oklahoma round of 32 6-7 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Annabel Croft
GBR Age 60
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Nicole Jagerman
NED Age 59 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Annabel Croft 6-7 6-3 6-3 Nicole Jagerman #107 Match data Feb 12, 1987* R32 Oklahoma WTA 250 Hard
Nicole Jagerman #179 2-6 7-5 6-3 Annabel Croft Match data Oct 3, 1986* R16 Hilversum WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Annabel Croft — — — 1,780 84 92 47.7% 0 0 0 1 0 1
Nicole Jagerman #685 #43 24 1,735 81 100 44.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Annabel Croft Nicole Jagerman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
14 1981 9–5 64.3% — 1,535 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1982 14–9 60.9% — 1,588 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1983 6–7 46.2% — 1,595 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1984 11–14 44.0% — 1,615 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1985 23–20 53.5% — 1,761 0 1 1986 9–4 69.2% #106 1,606 0 0
19 1986 10–19 34.5% — 1,653 0 1 1987 0–10 0.0% #206 1,479 0 0
20 1987 8–14 36.4% — 1,574 0 1 1988 11–10 52.4% #72 1,582 0 0
21 1988 3–3 50.0% — 1,562 0 1 1989 13–15 46.4% #82 1,658 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1990 12–13 48.0% #68 1,698 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 1991 10–11 47.6% #67 1,690 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 1992 9–14 39.1% #115 1,632 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 1993 12–11 52.2% #68 1,682 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 1994 4–11 26.7% #137 1,590 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 1995 1–1 50.0% #215 1,608 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Annabel Croft Nicole Jagerman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1980 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1982 — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1985 11 6 17 64.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 1986 — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
19 1986 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
20 1987 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 5 4 9 55.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1988 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 2 7 9 22.2% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 4 4 8 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 2 4 6 33.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 5 5 10 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 2 4 6 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 32 29 61 52.5% 13 19 32 40.6% 15 27 42 35.7% 11 12 23 47.8% — 21 32 53 39.6% 54 51 105 51.4% 2 10 12 16.7% 4 7 11 36.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Annabel Croft Nicole Jagerman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1980 1481 96.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1981 1535 118.4 — — — — — — +47 57.7% +1.42 1–1 0–1 — +0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1982 1589 120.1 — — — — — +11 -34 62.5% +1.17 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — +2.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1983 1595 118.1 — — — — -29 — +1 50.0% -0.07 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.87 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1984 1615 118.2 — — — — -3 -7 -8 46.4% -0.14 2–4 (33%) 2–5 (29%) 96.5 +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1985 1762 133.2 — — — — +72 -225 -211 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 4–4 (50%) 105.5 +0.98 1986 1607 116.3 — — — — 0 +33 — 63.3% +0.73 3–1 (75%) 3–0 (100%) 106.5 +1.74
19 1986 1653 120.6 — — — — +70 -91 -160 38.2% -1.06 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.5 -0.89 1987 1480 96.7 — — — — — +55 +35 9.1% -2.55 0–2 2–2 (50%) — +0.44
20 1987 1575 108.2 — — — — +47 — -109 42.3% -0.60 2–6 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 92.2 +0.97 1988 1582 121.0 — — — — +4 +31 — 50.0% -0.04 3–1 (75%) 4–1 (80%) 106.2 +0.50
21 1988 1562 97.6 — — — — +29 — — 42.9% -0.50 2–0 2–2 (50%) — +0.72 1989 1659 133.0 — — — — -114 +87 — 45.5% -0.17 6–6 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 104.0 +0.22
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1698 130.7 — — — — -75 +4 — 49.1% -0.57 1–4 (20%) 2–0 — -1.74
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1691 126.0 — — — — — +73 -152 42.2% -0.56 4–1 (80%) 2–3 (40%) 102.7 -1.09
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1632 128.5 — — — — -36 +72 — 42.0% -0.38 1–3 (25%) 3–4 (43%) 97.4 -0.22
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1683 131.2 — — — — -33 +15 — 51.0% +0.12 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.7 +0.14
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1590 112.1 — — — — +10 +71 — 30.3% -1.33 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 98.8 +0.31
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1608 114.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — -0.38
Career — 1780 125.1 — — — — +50 -68 -71 48.1% -0.03 21–28 (43%) 15–20 (43%) 92.1 +3.54 — 1736 132.3 — — — — -41 +52 -59 44.5% -0.39 21–21 (50%) 23–15 (61%) 107.3 -0.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.