H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Annabel Croft vs Nicole Jagerman H2H: 1-1
Annabel Croft and Nicole Jagerman are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nicole Jagerman leads 1–0 on carpet, while Annabel Croft leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Annabel Croft won the 1987 Oklahoma third round 6-7 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 60
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 58
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 1987* | Oklahoma | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Annabel Croft | 6-7 6-3 6-3 | Nicole Jagerman | Match data |
| Oct 3, 1986* | Hilversum | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Nicole Jagerman | 2-6 7-5 6-3 | Annabel Croft | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annabel Croft | — | — | — | 1,781 | 84 | 92 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Nicole Jagerman | #685 | #43 | 24 | 1,736 | 79 | 99 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Annabel Croft | Nicole Jagerman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1981 | 9–5 | 64.3% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1982 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1983 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1984 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1985 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,762 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #106 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 10–19 | 34.5% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 0–10 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 8–14 | 36.4% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #72 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #82 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #68 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #67 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #115 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #68 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #137 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #215 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |