H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Annabel Croft vs Pilar Vasquez H2H: 1-0
Annabel Croft holds a 1–0 lead over Pilar Vasquez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Annabel Croft leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Annabel Croft won the 1984 Indianapolis second round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 1984* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Annabel Croft | 6-1 6-4 | Pilar Vasquez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annabel Croft | — | — | — | 1,781 | 84 | 92 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Pilar Vasquez | #772 | #66 | 8 | 1,786 | 96 | 133 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Annabel Croft | Pilar Vasquez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1981 | 9–5 | 64.3% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1982 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1983 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1984 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 17–3 | 85.0% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 1985 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,762 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 22–11 | 66.7% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1986 | 10–19 | 34.5% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1987 | 8–14 | 36.4% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1988 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #116 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #116 | 1,438 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #149 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #151 | 1,482 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,510 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #194 | 1,497 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,473 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #306 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #292 | 1,420 | 0 | 4 |