H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Annabel Croft vs Sara Gomer H2H: 1-2

Sara Gomer holds a 2–1 lead over Annabel Croft in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Annabel Croft leads 1–0 on clay, while Sara Gomer leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sara Gomer won the 1985 Brisbane International round of 16 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Annabel Croft
GBR Age 60
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Sara Gomer
GBR Age 62 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sara Gomer 6-2 7-5 Annabel Croft Match data Nov 15, 1985* R16 Brisbane International WTA 500 Grass
Annabel Croft 6-1 6-4 Sara Gomer Match data May 8, 1982* QF Solihull WTA 250 Clay
Sara Gomer 6-4 4-6 8-6 Annabel Croft Match data Apr 10, 1981* R16 Norwich WTA 250 —

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Annabel Croft — — — 1,780 84 92 47.7% 0 0 0 1 0 1
Sara Gomer #317 #46 18 1,778 105 132 44.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Annabel Croft Sara Gomer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
14 1981 9–5 64.3% — 1,535 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1982 14–9 60.9% — 1,588 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1983 6–7 46.2% — 1,595 0 0 1980 2–1 66.7% — 1,518 0 0
17 1984 11–14 44.0% — 1,615 0 0 1981 7–8 46.7% — 1,517 0 0
18 1985 23–20 53.5% — 1,761 0 1 1982 6–4 60.0% — 1,545 0 0
19 1986 10–19 34.5% — 1,653 0 1 1983 3–7 30.0% — 1,531 0 0
20 1987 8–14 36.4% — 1,574 0 1 1984 1–5 16.7% #128 1,510 0 0
21 1988 3–3 50.0% — 1,562 0 1 1985 10–15 40.0% #101 1,568 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1986 13–14 48.1% #59 1,660 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 1987 18–19 48.6% #72 1,680 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 1988 20–16 55.6% #51 1,747 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 1989 7–12 36.8% #124 1,638 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 1990 6–8 42.9% #92 1,635 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 1991 8–13 38.1% #120 1,660 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 1992 4–10 28.6% #173 1,556 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Annabel Croft Sara Gomer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1980 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1982 — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1985 11 6 17 64.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 1982 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
19 1986 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1983 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
20 1987 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 — — — — — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1988 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 8 6 14 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 10 10 20 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 14 11 25 56.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1 6 7 14.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
Career — 32 29 61 52.5% 13 19 32 40.6% 15 27 42 35.7% 11 12 23 47.8% — 47 57 104 45.2% 8 17 25 32.0% 32 39 71 45.1% 7 10 17 41.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Annabel Croft Sara Gomer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1980 1481 96.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1981 1535 118.4 — — — — — — +47 57.7% +1.42 1–1 0–1 — +0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1982 1589 120.1 — — — — — +11 -34 62.5% +1.17 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — +2.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1983 1595 118.1 — — — — -29 — +1 50.0% -0.07 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.87 1980 1519 104.5 — — — — — — — 66.7% +0.83 — — — +0.03
17 1984 1615 118.2 — — — — -3 -7 -8 46.4% -0.14 2–4 (33%) 2–5 (29%) 96.5 +0.33 1981 1517 109.2 — — — — — — — 45.5% -0.09 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 102.6 +0.09
18 1985 1762 133.2 — — — — +72 -225 -211 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 4–4 (50%) 105.5 +0.98 1982 1545 105.7 — — — — — -19 — 60.0% +0.55 — 2–0 — +1.20
19 1986 1653 120.6 — — — — +70 -91 -160 38.2% -1.06 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.5 -0.89 1983 1532 102.6 — — — — +81 — +22 40.0% -0.92 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.8 +0.59
20 1987 1575 108.2 — — — — +47 — -109 42.3% -0.60 2–6 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 92.2 +0.97 1984 1511 108.2 — — — — — — +34 26.7% -1.60 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +0.16
21 1988 1562 97.6 — — — — +29 — — 42.9% -0.50 2–0 2–2 (50%) — +0.72 1985 1568 117.6 — — — — -18 — +24 42.9% -0.46 2–4 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 98.6 +1.64
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1660 119.5 — — — — -6 -213 -39 46.9% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 4–4 (50%) 103.7 +0.62
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1680 131.9 — — — — -13 — -6 46.3% -0.39 6–2 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 105.2 -0.33
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1747 138.3 — — — — -19 — -34 53.7% +0.15 6–4 (60%) 9–4 (69%) 108.3 -0.39
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1639 114.0 — — — — -23 -117 +78 43.5% -0.78 2–6 (25%) 1–0 — -0.51
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1636 113.1 — — — — -36 — +106 42.4% -0.48 3–2 (60%) 1–3 (25%) 99.2 +0.82
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1661 134.5 — — — — -33 — +111 40.4% -0.55 2–3 (40%) 0–3 (0%) 97.6 -1.11
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1557 104.1 — — — — +24 -82 — 34.4% -1.06 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 94.9 +1.43
Career — 1780 125.1 — — — — +50 -68 -71 48.1% -0.03 21–28 (43%) 15–20 (43%) 92.1 +3.54 — 1779 127.6 — — — — -13 -99 +25 45.3% -0.39 32–35 (48%) 31–30 (51%) 102.3 +1.79

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.