H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Annabel Ellwood vs Alexia Dechaume Balleret H2H: 0-1
Alexia Dechaume Balleret holds a 1–0 lead over Annabel Ellwood in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alexia Dechaume Balleret leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alexia Dechaume Balleret won the 1995 Auckland third round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 48
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 56
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 1995* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Alexia Dechaume Balleret | 6-2 6-0 | Annabel Ellwood | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annabel Ellwood | #1,021 | #57 | 398 | 1,573 | 18 | 54 | 25.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Alexia Dechaume Balleret | — | — | — | 1,739 | 127 | 181 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Annabel Ellwood | Alexia Dechaume Balleret | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1995 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1996 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #105 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1997 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #99 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #138 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #105 | 1,405 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,384 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #169 | 1,360 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,709 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1021 | 1,351 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 6–15 | 28.6% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 15–15 | 50.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 9–19 | 32.1% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |