H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Annabel Ellwood vs Li Ling Chen H2H: 1-0

Annabel Ellwood holds a 1–0 lead over Li Ling Chen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Annabel Ellwood leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Annabel Ellwood won the 1995 Surabaya quarterfinal 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Annabel Ellwood
AUS Age 48 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Li Ling Chen
CHN Age 55 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Annabel Ellwood #166 6-3 6-1 Li Ling Chen Match data Oct 7, 1995* QF Surabaya Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Annabel Ellwood #1,021 #57 398 1,573 18 54 25.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Li Ling Chen — — — 1,601 9 11 45.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Annabel Ellwood Li Ling Chen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1995 4–6 40.0% #129 1,523 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1996 2–9 18.2% #105 1,472 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1997 8–19 29.6% #99 1,425 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1998 3–5 37.5% #138 1,456 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1999 0–5 0.0% #105 1,405 0 0 1992 0–1 0.0% — 1,498 0 0
22 2000 0–4 0.0% #210 1,384 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2001 1–5 16.7% #169 1,360 0 0 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,507 0 0
24 2002 0–1 0.0% #1021 1,351 0 0 1995 4–4 50.0% — 1,524 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 1996 4–4 50.0% — 1,576 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% — 1,565 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Annabel Ellwood Li Ling Chen
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1995 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1996 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 8 11 19 42.1% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1999 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2000 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2001 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 18 41 59 30.5% 0 8 8 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — 9 10 19 47.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Annabel Ellwood Li Ling Chen
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1995 1524 110.9 — — — — +44 — — 40.9% -0.91 1–1 0–1 — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1996 1473 113.7 — — — — +46 — — 24.0% -1.20 1–2 (33%) — — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 1425 111.7 — — — — +94 +51 — 37.5% -0.77 2–8 (20%) 2–5 (29%) 91.2 +1.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 1457 109.8 — — — — +67 — — 36.8% -1.16 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1999 1405 95.7 — — — — +55 — — 16.7% -2.42 0–2 0–1 — +0.24 1992 1499 105.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.16
22 2000 1384 104.5 — — — — +60 — — 20.0% -2.30 0–2 — — -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2001 1361 97.4 — — — — +42 — — 37.5% -0.87 0–4 (0%) 0–2 — +0.43 1994 1508 106.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — +0.06
24 2002 1352 94.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.06 1995 1524 102.0 — — — — +26 — — 47.1% -0.06 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.60
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1576 125.1 — — — — +23 — — 50.0% -0.39 1–1 1–1 — -0.17
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1565 103.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.02
Career — 1573 111.0 — — — — +66 +51 — 32.9% -1.15 6–20 (23%) 2–10 (17%) 85.0 +3.04 — 1601 116.7 — — — — +25 — — 45.5% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 99.9 +1.55

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.