H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Annabel Ellwood vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 0-1
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer holds a 1–0 lead over Annabel Ellwood in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer won the 1996 Tokyo third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 48
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 1996* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 6-3 6-4 | Annabel Ellwood | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annabel Ellwood | #1,021 | #57 | 398 | 1,573 | 18 | 54 | 25.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Annabel Ellwood | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1995 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #105 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #99 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #138 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #105 | 1,405 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,384 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #169 | 1,360 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1021 | 1,351 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |