H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Annabel Ellwood vs Meredith Mcgrath H2H: 0-1

Meredith Mcgrath holds a 1–0 lead over Annabel Ellwood in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Meredith Mcgrath leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Meredith Mcgrath won the 1996 Birmingham round of 64 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Annabel Ellwood
AUS Age 48 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Meredith Mcgrath
USA Age 55

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Meredith Mcgrath #53 6-3 6-4 Annabel Ellwood #134 Match data Jun 12, 1996* R64 Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Annabel Ellwood #1,021 #57 398 1,573 18 54 25.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Meredith Mcgrath #315 #18 898 1,927 90 84 51.7% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Annabel Ellwood Meredith Mcgrath
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1995 4–6 40.0% #129 1,523 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #400 1,497 0 0
18 1996 2–9 18.2% #105 1,472 0 0 1989 6–10 37.5% #93 1,516 0 0
19 1997 8–19 29.6% #99 1,425 0 0 1990 15–12 55.6% #28 1,708 0 0
20 1998 3–5 37.5% #138 1,456 0 0 1991 4–6 40.0% #164 1,679 0 0
21 1999 0–5 0.0% #105 1,405 0 0 1992 0–1 0.0% #780 1,657 0 0
22 2000 0–4 0.0% #210 1,384 0 0 1993 12–12 50.0% #66 1,707 0 0
23 2001 1–5 16.7% #169 1,360 0 0 1994 22–16 57.9% #39 1,767 0 2
24 2002 0–1 0.0% #1021 1,351 0 0 1995 11–15 42.3% #62 1,742 0 2
25 — — — — — — — 1996 19–9 67.9% #26 1,917 0 3
27 — — — — — — — 1998 1–2 33.3% #318 1,895 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Annabel Ellwood Meredith Mcgrath
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1995 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1996 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1989 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
19 1997 8 11 19 42.1% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 3 1 4 75.0%
20 1998 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1999 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2000 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 2001 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
24 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 2 7 9 22.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 18 41 59 30.5% 0 8 8 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — 36 43 79 45.6% 8 11 19 42.1% 29 15 44 65.9% 17 15 32 53.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Annabel Ellwood Meredith Mcgrath
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1995 1524 110.9 — — — — +44 — — 40.9% -0.91 1–1 0–1 — -0.07 1988 1497 107.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.10
18 1996 1473 113.7 — — — — +46 — — 24.0% -1.20 1–2 (33%) — — +0.16 1989 1517 113.0 — — — — +50 — +23 34.4% -0.91 1–1 0–1 — +0.67
19 1997 1425 111.7 — — — — +94 +51 — 37.5% -0.77 2–8 (20%) 2–5 (29%) 91.2 +1.48 1990 1709 138.3 — — — — +2 — -93 54.1% +0.34 4–3 (57%) 5–4 (56%) 104.9 -0.50
20 1998 1457 109.8 — — — — +67 — — 36.8% -1.16 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.20 1991 1679 124.7 — — — — +46 — — 44.0% -0.44 2–3 (40%) 0–1 — +0.42
21 1999 1405 95.7 — — — — +55 — — 16.7% -2.42 0–2 0–1 — +0.24 1992 1658 94.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.08
22 2000 1384 104.5 — — — — +60 — — 20.0% -2.30 0–2 — — -0.31 1993 1708 131.5 — — — — -20 — -17 49.1% +0.04 5–4 (56%) 2–6 (25%) 100.0 -0.63
23 2001 1361 97.4 — — — — +42 — — 37.5% -0.87 0–4 (0%) 0–2 — +0.43 1994 1768 146.2 — — — — -39 -242 +61 52.9% +0.14 8–3 (73%) 4–3 (57%) 110.7 -2.14
24 2002 1352 94.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.06 1995 1742 142.5 — — — — +5 -174 — 49.1% +0.21 1–6 (14%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.72
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1917 143.6 — — — — -150 -312 +118 63.9% +0.89 6–1 (86%) 1–2 (33%) 105.3 -1.70
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1895 99.5 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — +0.03
Career — 1573 111.0 — — — — +66 +51 — 32.9% -1.15 6–20 (23%) 2–10 (17%) 85.0 +3.04 — 1928 144.8 — — — — -13 -243 +39 51.0% +0.12 28–22 (56%) 13–21 (38%) 105.1 -2.65

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.