H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Annabel Ellwood vs Miho Saeki H2H: 0-1
Miho Saeki holds a 1–0 lead over Annabel Ellwood in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Miho Saeki leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Miho Saeki won the 1997 Surabaya third round 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 48
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 50
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 1997* | Surabaya | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Miho Saeki | 7-6 6-3 | Annabel Ellwood | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annabel Ellwood | #1,021 | #57 | 398 | 1,573 | 18 | 54 | 25.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Miho Saeki | #884 | #56 | 461 | 1,579 | 26 | 57 | 31.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Annabel Ellwood | Miho Saeki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1995 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1996 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #105 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #99 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #138 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #105 | 1,405 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #76 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,384 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #89 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #169 | 1,360 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #119 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1021 | 1,351 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #201 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #256 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |