H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anne-Gaelle Sidot vs Laurence Courtois H2H: 3-0
Anne-Gaelle Sidot holds a 3–0 lead over Laurence Courtois in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anne-Gaelle Sidot leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Anne-Gaelle Sidot won the 2001 Indian Wells second round 5-7 7-6(3) 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 46
Left-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 50
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2001* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Anne-Gaelle Sidot | 5-7 7-6(3) 6-0 | Laurence Courtois | Match data |
| Sep 1, 1999* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Anne-Gaelle Sidot | 4-6 6-4 6-2 | Laurence Courtois | Match data |
| Feb 25, 1999* | Paris | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Anne-Gaelle Sidot | 6-3 4-6 6-2 | Laurence Courtois | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne-Gaelle Sidot | #252 | #24 | 1,128 | 1,751 | 90 | 125 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Laurence Courtois | #484 | #37 | 565 | 1,719 | 74 | 93 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne-Gaelle Sidot | Laurence Courtois | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1996 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1997 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #33 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1998 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #54 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #105 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1999 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #34 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #35 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #44 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #120 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #183 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #125 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #78 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #130 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #166 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |