H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anne Keothavong vs Ai Sugiyama H2H: 0-1

Ai Sugiyama holds a 1–0 lead over Anne Keothavong in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ai Sugiyama leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ai Sugiyama won the 2003 Eastbourne Open round of 32 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anne Keothavong
GBR Age 42 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Ai Sugiyama
JPN Age 51 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ai Sugiyama #13 6-2 6-2 Anne Keothavong #147 Match data Jun 19, 2003* R32 Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anne Keothavong #287 #48 1,315 1,633 48 90 34.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ai Sugiyama #97 #8 2,400 1,951 416 366 53.2% 0 0 0 2 4 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anne Keothavong Ai Sugiyama
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1992 1–4 20.0% #184 1,477 0 0
17 2001 0–1 0.0% #271 1,486 0 0 1993 3–8 27.3% #145 1,486 0 0
18 2002 0–1 0.0% #236 1,475 0 0 1994 9–11 45.0% #72 1,556 0 0
19 2003 0–2 0.0% #177 1,464 0 0 1995 16–17 48.5% #46 1,665 0 0
20 2004 2–4 33.3% #180 1,485 0 0 1996 24–19 55.8% #28 1,751 0 0
21 2005 1–3 25.0% #236 1,466 0 0 1997 31–25 55.4% #21 1,837 0 1
22 2006 0–7 0.0% #144 1,400 0 0 1998 37–21 63.8% #18 1,862 0 3
23 2007 3–5 37.5% #132 1,425 0 0 1999 27–23 54.0% #24 1,807 0 3
24 2008 4–8 33.3% #60 1,464 0 0 2000 20–25 44.4% #32 1,679 0 3
25 2009 13–15 46.4% #100 1,540 0 0 2001 28–25 52.8% #30 1,718 0 3
26 2010 11–13 45.8% #121 1,613 0 0 2002 35–26 57.4% #24 1,755 0 3
27 2011 8–9 47.1% #72 1,617 0 0 2003 44–25 63.8% #10 1,915 0 5
28 2012 6–18 25.0% #143 1,526 0 0 2004 33–23 58.9% #17 1,808 0 6
29 2013 0–4 0.0% #287 1,481 0 0 2005 28–27 50.9% #29 1,741 0 6
30 — — — — — — — 2006 28–25 52.8% #26 1,743 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 2007 17–21 44.7% #38 1,633 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 2008 26–22 54.2% #31 1,713 0 6
33 — — — — — — — 2009 9–19 32.1% #97 1,627 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anne Keothavong Ai Sugiyama
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
17 2001 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1993 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
18 2002 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1994 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
19 2003 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1995 5 8 13 38.5% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
20 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1996 19 11 30 63.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1997 19 13 32 59.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
22 2006 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1998 24 9 33 72.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 5 11 54.5%
23 2007 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1999 18 11 29 62.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
24 2008 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2000 11 13 24 45.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6%
25 2009 7 7 14 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2001 20 14 34 58.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2010 8 8 16 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2002 26 16 42 61.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2011 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2003 29 16 45 64.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
28 2012 4 11 15 26.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2004 22 14 36 61.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 2013 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2005 20 17 37 54.1% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 22 18 40 55.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 10 15 25 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 20 15 35 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 7 13 20 35.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
Career — 33 47 80 41.2% 7 12 19 36.8% 8 31 39 20.5% — — — — — 280 216 496 56.5% 59 67 126 46.8% 38 39 77 49.4% 39 44 83 47.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 111/136 of Anne Keothavong's and 170/347 of Ai Sugiyama's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anne Keothavong Ai Sugiyama
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2003 1/2 1.0 5.0 55.0% 54.5% 27.8% 50.0% 0.0% 42.5% 32.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 1/6 1.0 3.0 57.1% 50.0% 38.1% 44.4% 25.0% 44.9% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2005 1/4 0.0 2.0 59.1% 46.2% 22.2% 14.3% 100.0% 36.4% 31.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 3/7 1.3 2.0 56.9% 47.1% 38.4% 35.5% 54.5% 43.8% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 8/8 1.9 4.0 52.9% 60.9% 38.8% 41.8% 52.7% 51.0% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2008 12/12 2.4 3.5 57.9% 61.2% 40.5% 43.7% 40.4% 52.6% 45.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2009 24/28 2.6 3.0 58.7% 62.7% 45.1% 56.9% 43.0% 55.3% 44.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2010 21/24 1.7 3.1 57.4% 58.4% 44.8% 44.3% 48.3% 52.3% 44.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 15/17 1.4 3.7 58.8% 61.8% 48.1% 55.3% 52.1% 56.4% 44.6% 2003 12/69 0.8 5.8 60.8% 64.3% 45.1% 53.4% 43.3% 56.6% 48.3%
28 2012 21/24 2.6 4.3 53.8% 57.4% 40.5% 43.9% 41.0% 49.7% 39.4% 2004 11/56 1.2 4.5 60.8% 64.1% 45.3% 64.6% 47.8% 56.5% 48.7%
29 2013 4/4 2.0 3.8 56.5% 47.2% 45.0% 45.8% 35.8% 46.4% 37.4% 2005 7/55 1.4 5.0 65.8% 58.7% 40.3% 46.6% 51.4% 53.1% 42.6%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 37/53 1.3 3.7 67.8% 60.4% 43.2% 56.7% 47.8% 54.8% 44.7%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 36/38 1.2 5.6 62.8% 58.7% 42.4% 52.3% 50.3% 52.7% 47.1%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 41/48 0.9 5.3 63.3% 60.9% 43.5% 52.1% 43.6% 54.4% 45.4%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 26/28 0.8 4.9 65.4% 58.3% 42.7% 43.8% 45.1% 52.8% 41.1%
Career — 111/138 2.1 3.5 56.8% 59.2% 43.0% 47.8% 45.3% 52.2% 42.8% — 170/782 1.1 4.9 64.3% 60.3% 43.2% 52.6% 46.7% 54.1% 45.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anne Keothavong Ai Sugiyama
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1478 102.6 — — — — +34 — — 30.8% -1.31 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +0.31
17 2001 1486 99.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.13 1993 1487 125.5 — — — — +44 — — 37.0% -0.89 1–4 (20%) — — -0.26
18 2002 1476 98.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.04 1994 1557 120.7 — — — — +41 — — 47.8% +0.13 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +1.49
19 2003 1465 96.7 -0.21 -0.44 0.567 37.2% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.14 1995 1665 135.9 — — — — -9 -11 — 49.3% +0.23 4–7 (36%) 3–0 (100%) 101.9 +0.28
20 2004 1486 100.8 -1.08 -0.67 0.618 39.6% — — -13 43.8% -0.81 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — -0.30 1996 1751 143.7 — — — — -8 -156 -152 54.3% +0.29 5–5 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 99.1 +0.30
21 2005 1467 93.4 -2.33 -1.56 0.496 34.1% — — — 25.0% -1.88 — — — +0.24 1997 1837 150.1 — — — — +27 -234 -204 51.5% 0.00 14–8 (64%) 11–8 (58%) 106.9 -1.35
22 2006 1401 89.0 -3.21 -4.76 0.551 37.7% +51 — -4 6.7% -3.53 0–1 1–0 — -0.03 1998 1862 153.1 — — — — +57 -206 -239 60.3% +0.68 12–5 (71%) 9–4 (69%) 107.7 +0.41
23 2007 1425 100.9 -2.40 +0.38 0.930 48.4% +60 — -67 44.4% -0.44 0–2 0–2 — +0.41 1999 1808 151.0 — — — — +46 -168 -203 53.0% +0.21 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) 99.6 -1.12
24 2008 1465 118.5 -1.50 +0.68 0.954 48.9% +49 — -108 35.7% -0.57 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 101.0 +0.21 2000 1679 137.5 — — — — +24 +5 -92 46.1% -0.54 5–7 (42%) 7–5 (58%) 99.7 -0.80
25 2009 1540 114.7 -0.29 -0.29 0.999 50.0% +25 +44 -156 46.8% -0.50 3–5 (38%) 6–2 (75%) 101.8 +1.51 2001 1719 138.7 — — — — +19 -57 -121 53.7% +0.17 10–11 (48%) 6–2 (75%) 102.9 -0.48
26 2010 1613 116.3 -2.69 +0.49 0.935 48.4% +3 -16 -248 44.6% -0.57 5–5 (50%) 1–1 — -0.61 2002 1755 141.6 — — — — +15 -109 -67 56.1% +0.32 9–8 (53%) 8–6 (57%) 100.6 -0.40
27 2011 1618 117.6 +0.58 +1.18 1.022 50.6% +10 — — 51.2% +0.15 2–5 (29%) 0–2 — +0.35 2003 1915 154.1 +1.48 +3.41 1.113 52.2% -8 -157 -164 58.3% +0.63 22–10 (69%) 7–7 (50%) 105.4 +1.81
28 2012 1527 113.8 -3.60 -2.34 0.783 44.5% +33 -4 -99 35.2% -1.00 1–7 (13%) 2–2 (50%) 94.2 -0.95 2004 1808 144.1 +0.61 +2.40 1.121 52.5% -4 -67 +28 57.5% +0.58 8–7 (53%) 4–8 (33%) 97.4 +2.38
29 2013 1481 97.1 -3.69 -0.76 0.696 42.0% — — — 0.0% -3.38 — — — -0.11 2005 1742 133.4 -1.10 -0.52 0.908 47.7% +17 -41 -12 51.1% +0.11 11–16 (41%) 6–4 (60%) 94.4 +2.95
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1744 138.5 -0.78 +0.79 0.988 49.8% +9 -91 +46 50.8% +0.14 10–8 (56%) 2–14 (13%) 94.4 +0.98
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1633 125.5 -2.23 +2.56 0.996 50.0% -7 +43 +130 47.3% -0.13 8–9 (47%) 5–4 (56%) 98.7 +1.74
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1713 136.4 -0.29 +1.82 0.995 49.6% +26 -71 +32 48.5% -0.19 8–5 (62%) 5–5 (50%) 105.2 +0.32
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1627 135.9 -1.68 -1.34 0.871 46.9% +43 -37 +108 35.6% -0.86 2–5 (29%) 4–3 (57%) 100.4 -0.98
Career — 1633 113.5 -1.76 -0.33 0.896 47.5% +25 +21 -101 39.3% -0.82 14–31 (31%) 13–12 (52%) 92.4 +0.54 — 1952 148.1 -0.87 +1.32 0.986 49.6% +18 -90 -55 52.1% +0.15 142–128 (53%) 85–81 (51%) 103.0 +0.97

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.