H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Anne Keothavong vs Laura Granville H2H: 0-1
Laura Granville holds a 1–0 lead over Anne Keothavong in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laura Granville leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Laura Granville won the 2005 Birmingham second round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 42
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 45
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2005* | Birmingham | WTA 500 | R64 | Grass | Laura Granville | 6-2 6-0 | Anne Keothavong | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Keothavong | #287 | #48 | 1,315 | 1,633 | 48 | 89 | 35.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Laura Granville | #466 | #28 | 1,063 | 1,722 | 86 | 108 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Keothavong | Laura Granville | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #841 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #180 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #236 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #49 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,400 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #132 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #74 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #60 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #60 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #100 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #121 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #61 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #379 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #143 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |